Skip to main content

Delaware Libertarian makes the News Journal--at least in a small way

In today's News Journal Beth Miller has an important and thoughtful article about the Delaware child abuse reporting law and the issue of priestly sexual abuse in the Diocese of Wilmington.

You should read it all; I know that Beth put a remarkable amount research time into this piece, and I think it outlines the major issues quite well.

Of course, you'll understand if this is my favorite part:

The Diocese of Wilmington has not followed all the national patterns, though.

Neuberger, a relentless pugilist who spares few words when describing the failings of his clients' opponents, was surprised by Saltarelli's approach as settlement negotiations unfolded. And, as might be expected, Neuberger's tone changed dramatically after the diocese settled its first two cases without putting either plaintiff through the rigors of deposition and cross-examination.

"The bishop is not following the scorched-earth policy of some other dioceses," Neuberger said. "The big surprise was that the diocese went down the avenue of restorative justice."

Steve Newton, a history professor at Delaware State University who converted to Catholicism about four years ago, has appreciated Saltarelli's recent approach.

"I'm sure there are cases where the diocese has not handled it as well," said Newton, who writes the Delaware Libertarian blog. "But the bishop has led the diocese in assuming responsibility for dealing with this issue ... I think creating that window and that exception was a good thing. I think the legislature crafted a really good compromise for attacking a really difficult problem."
[emphasis obviously added]


I thank Beth for the plug, but more importantly, I thank her for the story.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Mind if I ask what you were before converting?

Just curious.

And as a Libertarian, what did yu think of the Pope's visit.

I was surprised and proud of his brave new approach.....
kavips
I was raised agnostic/atheist (never actually saw the inside of a church until I was in Boy Scouts). Married Catholic and agreed to raise kids that way; came in slowly as they grew up.

This pope both mystifies/excites me and repels me at the same time. An obvious intellectual (read his God and the World from the early 1990s) he is also in some ways the most reactionary pope in decades.

I really don't know what to think about him.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...