Skip to main content

In praise of real specialists and small town doctors

Dr. David Bell is the town doctor for the small community of Lyndonville NY, up near Lake Ontario. He set up his practice there in 1977. In 1985 there was a viral outbreak followed by an upsurge in cases of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, which led him into what became his life's work. Or, I should say, his second life's work, as he continues to be the small town doc decades later.

Along with Dr Peter Rowe at Johns Hopkins University, Dr Bell has become the foremost authority on Chronic Fatigue in the nation (he advises the CDCP).

He is the specialist we drove to visit on Monday.

The experience was amazing.

In three hours, using no equipment more sophisticated than a blood pressure cuff and a reflex hammer, Dr. Bell managed to make my son's body demonstrate virtually every symptom we had seen at home over the past two years.

He shared with us the technical names for all the phenomena we had observed (but could never find written down anywhere), and talked us through all the ongoing research. I won't take you through it all (although if it is germane to you personally, let me know and I'll be glad to share), but will summarize thus:

1. We know now exactly what sort of illness the CFS actually is, and how (to the extent that the research has been done) it affects our son's body. [The effect begins with an abnormal cortikyne response to a virus and leads to a dynamic abnormality in the cellular mitochondria in ATP processing; see, I told you it was complicated--but I understand it now.)

2. We understand how his symptoms related to his illness, and what his prognosis is. (Even if not treated, we can expect an 80% chance of a complete recovery within two years.)

3. We understand the limited treatment options available.

Only if you have ever had a loved one with a serious illness will you understand this: part of the news was not good, but knowing is always better than not knowing. The mind can create hells more profound than nature even attempts.

I'm exhausted, as you may have concluded by the light and limited nature of my posting for the past couple of days.

But I am also strangely elated: we're not crazy; our son has a recognizable illness; there are decisions we can make to improve both how he feels today and his long-term prognosis. These are--as the credit card commercial says--priceless gifts.

Oh, and there is one thing more.

Dr Bell hangs out his shingle in a tiny community health clinic. We paid a very large consulting fee for three hours of his time, a fee I don't begrudge, and a fee unlikely to be covered by insurance.

What I suspect that Dr Bell does with that fee is use it to provide free or reduced cost medical treatment to the families in his town who don't have insurance or cannot pay. He's that kind of man, and it's that kind of town.

There's no government involved in that transaction, just an old-fashioned country doctor who has become a national expert.

We don't see much of that any more, which says an awful lot about what's wrong with America.

Comments

This is exceptional news- especially the potential for improvement! I am greatly relieved.
Encouraging news, Steve. Thanks for sharing.
Anonymous said…
I am thrilled to hear that your son will likely recover in a couple of years. I'm sure that peace of mind was worth every penny.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...