Skip to main content

New Castle County attempts to balance budget with new hidden tax on your yard

At least that's what the NCCo instant ticket program for unsightly yards and properties really appears to be for.

Last year, New Castle County collected $74,425 in fines for people violating code.

But going through all that pesky red tape--you know, actual charges and a judge and all that--was apparently too time-consuming or too costly (kind of like those damn FISA surveillance rules), so authorities implemented the instant ticket.

Here's how this new, highly efficient system works:

Step one: some neighbor rats you out for an inoperable car parked in your driveway.

Step two: an inspector shows up and writes you a $50 ticket.

Step three: you either plead guilty and send in the money, or plead not guilty and send in the money. [Not much difference there, huh?]

Step four: an official from the same organization that wrote you the ticket rejects your appeal [because, after all, that inspector doesn't have to worry about that funky old presumption of innocence thing].

Step five: the county waits a couple weeks and sends somebody back out to ticket you again [probably for the oil stain left when you towed the car away].

In seven weeks this program has raised $81,700. Annualized, that's $606,914.29.

That means they are on track to write 12,138 tickets.

Now, in theory, you'd think that there probably weren't 12,000 badly maintained properties in New Castle County.

But for money like this, you can bet the tax farmers will become inventive.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Someone call them on Bill Bell's lawn....and Paul Clarks.....
Tyler Nixon said…
Ending despicable schemes like this for godd in Delaware will be high on my list of legislative proposals, if I make it to Dover.

These intra-state "lesser" governments think that because they are below the radar, in a sense, and "local" that they can do away with things like due process and other guarantees against takings.

"Hey, it's only $50 right? Shut up and just pay it. We are running short on gold-plated ass-scratchers down at the County Government palace."

Disgusting.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...