Skip to main content

There is no end to what you can blame on Angela Keaton: Ron Paul was mean to Bob Barr

Or, at least, Ron Paul's peeps were mean to Bob Barr's peeps, when all Barr ever wanted to do was have Dr. No on his ticket as VP.

Robert Kraus, acting Executive Director of the Libertarian Party, has had Andrew Davis post a long missive excoriating the Ron Paul folks for treating the Barr campaign poorly:

I have been hearing a lot from many LP Members about concerns over Bob Barr not attending Ron Paul's press conference.

However, before you form an opinion, perhaps you may want to consider the facts and not rely on blogs for your news.


Of course, Kraus is posting this (get ready for it) . . . on a blog.

Kraus then proceeds on his litany of abuses suffered at the hands of the Ron Paul movement, which basically boils down [read it yourself] to:

Wah. Wah. Mean old Dr. Paul wouldn't accept the Libertarian nomination. Wah. Wah. Mean old Dr. Paul wouldn't endorse us. Wah. Wah. Mean old Dr. Paul only wants to promote his book.


This is then followed by a very interesting set of sentences:

I hope this answers some of your concerns and questions. Our staff, volunteers and the Barr/Root campaign are totally psyched up and ready to work very hard for all Libertarians through November and beyond – including ballot access, in as many states as possible, which will benefit all Libertarian Candidates!

We hope you too will continue to support those candidates that support your views, even if just on a local or state level.


...even if on just a local or state level?

Which means that the Bob Barr campaign has finally twigged to the fact that many of us have already dropped out from supporting their man for President?

Wow. They're more insightful than I thought.

Of course, as fund-raising dwindles, the addition of Sarah Palin to the GOP ticket starts to pull oxygen out of the room, the Barr campaign fumbles ballot access, and the LNC spends its time conducting witch hunts, there's really only one conclusion to draw:

Damn that Angela Keaton!

Comments

Eric Dondero said…
Interesting you don't mention the reason why Barr's support is "dwindling" over Palin.

Look, Barr/Root has already succeeded. You could say they are already the most successful Libertarian ticket of all time.

Does anyone seriously believe John McCain would have picked such a libertarian VP with such strong ties to the Libertarian Party - Sarah Palin - were it not for the fact that Barr/Root was polling in the 5 to 6% range nationwide?

We should be celebrating and thanking Bob Barr, for getting Sarah Palin on the GOP ticket, not dissing him.
Anonymous said…
I wish Dondero would share whatever it is that he smokes, it has got to be better than what Kubby gets because at least Kubby is usually connected to some form of reality... ;-)

Given the letter I just sent out, you can ask what kind of impression Barr makes when he pulls stunts like this, and how it helps him w/ ballot access...

(Hint - Barr won't be on in Mass. if I have anything to say about it....)

ART
LPMA Presidential Elector, NOT substituting BARR
Speaking for myself
Anonymous said…
Barr/Root has already succeeded. You could say they are already the most successful Libertarian ticket of all time.

Sure, if the goal was wrecking the Libertarian Party.

Which most of us have long known is your ultimate goal, Mr. Rittberg.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...