Skip to main content

Without need for title



[h/t Anarchist Bitch]

Comments

Anonymous said…
Never mind the travesty of using a coffin for some political purpose.

Inside the coffin is some family member,
that does not give a damn about YOUR ‘labels’.

Inside that coffin, is a
soldier, marine airman or sailor that volunteered.
=====================
Which one was Black? White, Yellow? Brown? Red?
Which one was poor?
Which one followed in a parent, grandparent or uncle’s previous service?
Which one was well off?
Which one was an Officer?
Which one was Enlisted?
Which one was a Boy Scout?
Which one believed in Duty, Honor and Country?

The missing coffin is the liberal that does not believe in Duty, Honor or Country [ conflicting values with being progressive, and all that.].
The missing coffin is the one of the person without a HS degree. [ unqualified ]
The missing coffin is the convicted criminal, who would rather rob, steal and injure others, instead of providing positive and responsible service to others. AND contribute to helping society and this country to succeed. [ unqualified ]
The missing coffin is the drug addict and one with the immune deficiency and blood disease. [health ]
The missing coffin is the person who is overweight. [health and physical fitness ]

Remember, BIGOTRY works BOTH ways. It is intolerance to the beliefs of others. Defining a belief as indisputable, when there are opposing beliefs, is just a matter of trying to control the argument. It still is BIGOTRY, hidden by the political correctness scam.

Tolerance does not mean nor demand ACCEPTANCE.

I may or might tolerate your beliefs and actions, and STILL be adamant that I do not ACCEPT such behavior.

And I and everyone else should be allowed, within the original meanings of the first amendment to exercise my right to an opinion, and to voice that opinion.

Your liberty ends where my liberty begins. And vice-versa [ sp? ] .

Paul F.
Paul
13,000 gay Americans have been discharged from the armed forces over the past ten years.

Very few if any had actually engaged in any conduct that is criminal.

On the other hand, during the same period the US military accepted over 10,000 people for enlistment with "moral waivers" that allowed the recruiters to overlook convictions--fucking convictions--for sexual assault, manslaughter, grand theft or other felony.

I served 20+ years; some of the finest officers, NCOs, and enlisted people with whom I served had to spend their entire career pretending to be something they were not. Several were discharged under other than honorable conditions for no crime whatsoever.

With all due respect, on this issue you have no idea what you are talking about.
Anonymous said…
With all due respect, on this issue you have no idea what you are talking about.

With all due respect, I have my opinion.

With all due respect, do you presume, by virtue of your supreme intelligence and knowledge base to tell me I am wrong?

Then in this political world, all you need to control is the politics of the situation. And then you can demand of me to become compliant. And otherwise, then you can just declare that I am misinformed.

1984?

With all due respect, fuck you.

Paul.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...