Skip to main content

What I saw at the UD/DFM debate. . . .

About 30% of the seats in the theater were empty. . .

About 10% of the remainder left after the US House lovefest between Carney and Kovach, probably so they could catch the presidential debate.

After Ralph Begleiter got up on stage and said this is the part of democracy where we have to hear from the candidates, they need to be able to get their messages out, because that's why we have debates--

[of course he carefully eliminated half the ballot-qualified candidates]

--and we have police here to cart out anybody who uses their phone or claps or says anything--

[which is roughly when Green US House candidate Bernie August jumped up and Occupy Delaware went into "Mic Check" action with about 15 protesters standing up and shouting about exclusion.  There were more protesters than police, so it took about four minutes to get them all out of the hall, some of them dragged in headlocks.  All the people in the VIP seats pretended not to see.]

Then John Carney and Tom Kovach sat on the stage and gave each other deep political tongue for an hour. . .

Both of them said they would like to eliminate significant parts of Obamacare while keeping pre-existing and coverage for 26 year old children, but Carney wants to cut reimbursements to providers even further, and doesn't know if the individual mandate should stand as written. . . Kovach pretty much the same. . .

Carney thinks we shouldn't be nation building in Afghanistan but both agreed that we should be able to send troops anywhere we need to. . . no matter what the people there think about it.

Kovach promises to raise taxes if necessary, so does Carney

They differ on education but frankly neither of them knows what they are talking about . . . .

Frankly, if they hadn't said you couldn't leave before the end of the debate I would have left, because it ended up as really big . . . who cares?

Comments

Scott Gesty said…
It was an interesting experiance indeed. More so the beginning than the content.
delacrat said…
I was there.

Begleiter was ever so nice in how he admonished us to do what he said, STFU or else.

One of the Occupiers was dragged away in a headlock by someone not in uniform and didn't identify himself as police or U of D security. Presumably, he had power of arrest and wasn't just some D or R party goon. Who knows? So would the patriot in the headlock be within his rights to defend himself; risking a charge of assaulting a P.O. ?

Either, way it was ugly. Seemed like a mugging to me. I suppose in any other circumstance it would be. What does it say about the government's legitimacy when it relies on force and secrecy to deal with voters?

The "debate" was empty. Mostly an agreement frenzy.
anonone said…
Meanwhile, the Green Party Presidential candidate and Vice Presidential candidate were handcuffed to chairs for 8 hours yesterday to keep them away from the Presidential Debate.

Isn't it comforting to know that we live in a country that arrests major-party opposition candidates?
kavips said…
Hat's off to Bernie. Patriotism comes out only when it is being suppressed.

The attempt to keep the debate dumbed down so the status quo could remain... ie Carney wins, and Kovich wins his next seat whatever it may be, appears to be successful.

I think the problem stems from the fact that third party candidates in the "olden" days were kooky, and that stereotype remains, even though it now consists of smart people who are simply trying to right the wrongs of the current system.
Anonymous said…
Wherever Tom Gordon goes, he brings his personal army. I imagine it was an undercover cop. Unless it was one of the AFLCIO guys like follow the governor to every stop.
Anonymous said…
"So would the patriot in the headlock be within his rights to defend himself; risking a charge of assaulting a P.O. ?"

Well, since I was a few feet from the incident, I can say if he did try and defend himself, he probably would have hit the one uniformed State Trooper in the audience. That would have made it even uglier than it already was.

I have no idea who the plain clothed person was or who he was affiliated with. But I heard what he whispered in protesters ear before the mugging commenced. If that person reads this blog, all I can say is, people are listening, spreading the word and one day, the person sitting in the chair a few away isnt going to be there to just 'observe',,,,,
Unknown said…
This from one of the people arrested at the UD debacle. If anyone witnessed his mistreatment, please call Desmond Kahn at the number listed below:

Hello, I would like to request that anyone who witnesses my seizure and later arrest in Mitchell Hall last Tuesday would please contact me. If anyone knows someone who did, could you please let me know who they were. I understand from Andy that Steve Newton of the Libertarian Party was sitting behind me and he saw the whole thing, but anyone who saw me being dragged out of the row, up the aisle and through the lobby would be helpful. my number at home is 302-368-4854
Desmond Kahn

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...