Skip to main content

Just put me down on the "doggone . . . road to perdition"



If we cannot be proud enough as a country to sing “American the Beautiful” in English in a commercial during the Super Bowl, by a company as American as they come — doggone we are on the road to perdition. This was a truly disturbing commercial for me, what say you?
Let's parse this--and in the process provide an example of Libertarian thought applicable to Delaware.

First, the idea of ascribing social inferiority based on language, and the idea of using the power of the government to try to restrict or channel the languages that people can speak (the allusion to TR) is pretty much anathema to libertarians.

Then I note that those who argue that neither businesses nor the government should have to treat with people who don't speak English are allowing their jingoism to get in the way of perfectly good (and profitable) free-market solutions to their "problem."  As Dr. Vince Schaller (former owner of Hockessin Walk-In) told me, it cost him only a couple bucks a day to have an on-call, multi-language translation service available by telephone during his business hours.  Those few dollars were more than recovered by the fact that Spanish, Korean, Chinese, and Vietnamese-speaking individuals made his their medical aid unit of choice, and brought him their business.

I also would remind former Congressman West and his followers that it is ideas and ideals, not language that makes up American culture.  The French-speaking immigrants to Louisiana gave us the rich Creole culture; the German Moravians and other similar immigrants joined in creating the whole ethic of self-reliance; many elderly Italian, German, Polish, Hungarian, and Russian immigrants came to America in the early part of the 20th Century and never learned very much English, but were among the staunchest American patriots our nation has ever known.

More amusing, perhaps, is Congressman West's casual acceptance of the Coca Cola transnational corporation as being "a company as American as they come."  What a hoot, Alan.  Have you ever examined the multinational holdings of your favorite company?
The Company manufactures, markets and sells Leao / Matte Leao teas in Brazil through a joint venture with its bottling partners. During 2011, the Company introduced a variety of brands, brand extensions and beverage products: the Latin America group launched Frugos Sabores Caseros; in the Pacific group, Fanta, a fruit-flavored sparkling beverage, was relaunched in Singapore and Malaysia; Real Leaf, a green tea-based beverage, launched two varieties in Vietnam; and in South Korea it introduced three flavor variants of the Georgia Emerald Mountain Blend ready-to-drink coffee beverage and Burn Intense, an energy drink; the Europe group launched Powerade ION4 in Denmark, Norway, Sweden and France, France launched Powerade Zero; in the Eurasia and Africa group, Turkey launched Cappy Pulpy, and India launched Fanta Powder, an orange-flavored powder formulation; Schweppes Novida, a sparkling malt drink, was launched in Kenya and Uganda; and in Uganda Coca-Cola Zero was launched; in Egypt, it launched Cappy Fruitbite; and Schweppes Gold, a sparkling flavored malt drink, and in Ghana, it launched Schweppes Malt, a dark malt drink. During 2011, the Company sold approximately 26.7 billion unit cases of its products.
 If you want to find something offensive about Coca Cola's overtly cute "America the Beautiful" ad, then consider the unlovely aspects of the company itself, or its monopolistic business practices, or its political contributions to Congressman John Carney, Senator Tom Carper, Senator Chris Coons, and . . . yes . . . . former Congressman Alan West.

Comments

tom said…
Individuals and businesses should be free to discriminate in any way they see fit. In a free market the loss of profits will punish discrimination.

Governments, on the other hand, because of their coercive and monopolistic nature should not. By no means would I advocate translating our entire body of law and regulations into other languages at taxpayer expense, or even requiring government employees to be multi-lingual. But whenever a non-native speaker is forced to deal with any representative of government, a competent translator should be available upon request.
The problem, Tom, is that free markets as you describe right now do not exist. So to argue that, in government-rigged and supported markets, "individuals and businesses should be free to discriminate in any way they see fit" is effectively a non-sequiteur.
tom said…
You are correct that free markets (as I describe) do not actually exist. but that does not invalidate my point.

Even the sort-of, slightly free market we have now is not rigged, Jim Crow style, against people who don't speak English. And that is probably why Dr. Schaller's willingness to innovate and re-invent his practice allowed him to last longer as an independent clinic than any of his competitors.
Unknown said…
Hmmm! a language translator in Miami had told me that this is really a good commercial that gives American dream's message to all over the world. Well I agree with him, we shouldn't be limited to North America only.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...