Skip to main content

Moving toward a Libertarian Delaware: The first painful step

One of the reasons, a long time ago, that I left active participation in the Libertarian movement is that nobody could ever provide me with a map of “how to get there from here.” By and large the answers I got were either: “We’re going to have to educate the younger generation because this one’s too addicted to the current set of government hand-outs to change,” or, “Eventually, the existing set-up will collapse of its own weight, and we’ll be there to pick up the pieces.”

Neither approach appeals to me, because both of them appear to punt on the idea that we can begin making incremental changes toward greater individual liberty and smaller government today. Ourselves. With our neighbors. And organize to go forward.

If you want to break other people of the idea of taking government hand-outs (in exchange for paying high taxes and turning over control of your own life), then the first thing you have to do is stop or materially reduce the government hand-outs you accept. Doing so is often painful, especially when you see other people willing to nourish themselves endlessly at the governmental teat, but it is possible.

We pay my daughter’s medical bills, and help with her son’s daycare. Boiling down a long story to short, my eldest daughter can no longer be carried on our health insurance, and the job she works pays no benefits. During her pregnancy we discovered that she was eligible for all kinds of things, like free milk, cheese, and cereal from WIC, or—later—daycare assistance. Twice she even went and got the milk at Acme, before we realized what a trap this all is.

She’s our daughter; her son is our grandchild. We’re responsible as family, and we can damn well afford to buy the food to feed them. More to the point, when we looked at the so-called “daycare assistance” the State provides, we discovered that really outstanding daycare, the type we wanted him to have, is not covered by the State plan. We even discovered that having top-quality daycare actually reduced the amount of child support she could receive from the man we fondly refer to as the “sperm donor,” because according to the formula that Family Court uses, we spend too much on our grandson’s daycare.
So we told the government to take a hike, and made the economic choices necessary to take care of our own family. We write a hefty check every month, and sometimes it really hurts. That’s the price you pay for freedom of choice.

Unfortunately, many of the little government giveaways are hidden from view, which is exactly how the statist Demopublicans like them. State and cities give out community development grants, the legislature provides extra money for the local firehouse, or there’s economic development money available for certain tourist areas. We are conditioned not to think of these items as hand-outs; they have somehow become—what’s that word?—entitlements.

Drive a Prius and the government will give you a tax credit. Adopt a child and the government will give you a tax credit. Teachers can claim a $400 credit on their taxes for materials bought for their students. Measure off a home office and claim a tax break.

I don’t like the idea at all that the government has decided to use my money (as a tax payer) to indulge in social engineering (by handing out credits and breaks for engaging in approved behaviors), so I try not to play that game. Does it cost you money to disengage from this sort of entitlement heroin? Yes, it sure does.

But the idea that personal freedom isn’t free doesn’t just apply to the sacrifices of our soldiers.

If you want to begin to sell other people on the idea of smaller government and more personal responsibility, then you’ve got to do more than talk the talk.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Good for you Steve! I have done substantially the same thing. Since I sold my business, I have become eligible for all sorts of "freebies". No thanks. But I have a choice. The choice for less wealthy people used to be church or community. The government has displaced those sources to a large degree. Are they still available? Would it harm the recipients self esteem if they had to ask neighbors instead of demanding it from the Government?

I can just hear the chorus on the Left warming up though. Expect a lecture on democracy from donviti!
Sam said…
Bravo! One more American to point out the over-rated "feebies" the government dishes out.

When I was a very young woman in my twenties, my new husband and I were placed in an unwilling position of not knowing where our next meal would come from, as his new job paid a meager $400 monthly. We still had 3 weeks to go before that paltry paycheck would come in.

Naive as I was, I promptly marched down to the welfare office to get food stamps. I waited 6 hours to see someone, and watched numerous women file in and out with 3-4 young toddlers in tow, all thumbing through their books of food stamps as they left. Each time, I was heartened, thinking my turn would come soon.

When my turn came, I was told my husband made too much money and we qualified for $10 of food stamps for the remaining three weeks of that month! She didn't seem to understand that we had nothing, no food, nothing, and that we would not see his first paycheck for three weeks.

At first I wanted to cry, and then I got mad. I handed the $10 of stamps back to her and walked out. I headed over to the plasma bank and donated 2 pints for $13, and was told I could return to do so again every two days. Then I went to the market and bought enough food to feed us for a week. In two days, I went back and donated again. This paid for my husband's gas for another week. And it went thusly for another 4 months before I found a job myself. Our pastor had us in for dinner several times a week as well.

We survived on our own and it forever shaped my attitude on life, on work ethic, and never asking for anything I didn't work for myself.

Incidentally, in one of my short lived jobs, a door to door selling job, I met one of those women I saw in the welfare office. She was delighted to tell me how she managed to live in such a nice house, drive such a nice car, and buy all the clothes she wanted, all on the government dime. She just kept getting pregnant.

I felt sorry for her, for she will never have the pride and integrity that goes along with realizing a dream by the power of your own efforts.

Sadly, 27 years later, our government still encourages this. I'd like them all to thank me, since their benefits come from my hard earned pay.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...