Skip to main content

Introducing the Ten-Minute Libertarian

I was browsing at Borders last night and found, among lots and lots of other things, a little book called The Ten Minute Activist, which upon examination didn't convince me to buy, but did make me want to steal the concept.

The idea is that working toward whatever your social vision happens to be does not have to start with life-changing involvement. You don't have to give away your possessions, spend Christmas in Iowa bothering people for the candidate of your choice, or load the kids in the van for a family trip to PC World.

You can start to make some difference ten minutes at a time.

So I'm going to run some of these ideas as I find them, and hope some of you will offer some additional suggestions.

Here's the first one:

Libertarians are big on personal privacy, and the government--90% of the time--is not. But the Federal Trade Commission has finally gotten around to extending its "Do Not Call" registry to cell phones, and to setting up a user-friendly website that allows you to register up to three phone numbers at a time. Enter the numbers and you'll get an email with a link to click; that's it.

I'm sure some Libertarians have mixed feelings about this, wondering about the principle of restricting a business's ability to make "cold calls" for new customers. And there is some merit in this reservation, but I personally believe my right NOT to be bothered should trump theirs to troll for new business.

Moreover, the government doesn't get to use coercive force against them unless and until somebody actually complains.

So given that the rest of the State wants to redefine my privacy out of existence, at least the FTC provides a reasonable service to American citizens.

Comments

Brian Shields said…
So, you're saying add random phone numbers to the registry as some form of vigilante justice?
One thing worth mentioning is that form time to time you have to re-up with the no call list- a little accomodation to the "call you during dinner industry."
Now that you mention it, not a bad idea
The Last Ephor said…
Again the main issue here is cost. It costs me nothing to get junk mail. It costs me money to get a cell phone call.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...