Skip to main content

Why we need to dump the Demopublicans in Delaware?

My top ten reasons (at first they were going to count down in order, but then I kept not being able to prioritize them):

10. Everyone is always surprised when Delaware Psychiatric, Delaware Corrections, of DFS has another scandal; you have to wonder why, since there was no oversight built into these systems.

9. We have such a fully functional nepotism system that not only can your otherwise unemployable children get state jobs if you are an elected official, but you can get the entire Democratic Party membership to vote for Beau Biden as Attorney General.

8. Our environmental protection from our elected officials is so good that New Castle Country air quality is among the worst in the nation, bad water kills off thousands of fish on a regular basis, and the second smallest state in the country has 14 EPE superfund cleanup sites active.

7. Our Freedom of Information Act allows organizations like DSU to hide the salaries of legislators who work for them and openly lobby for them to get more money.

6. We have representatives attempting to hide anti-abortion language in the anti-cloning bill, and a bipartisan team of senators proposing a constitutional amendment that will not only prohibit gay marriage and civil unions, but also effectively nullifies part of the US Constitution.

5. We have the city of Wilmington declaring eminent domain over private businesses for economic development purposes.

4. We have a business/education lobby that is trying to help itself to $100 million in public funds for so-called "education reform" that is not selling well with the public, so they use their own house organ policy research institute to pimp for it and the News Journal prints that as legitimate news. (We won't talk about how many school districts are in financial trouble.)

3. We actually have elected officials trying to get John Atkins back into the General Assembly.

2. Many of our legislators are actually sitting back and quietly conspiring to help Delmarva Power kill wind power.

1. We're actually contemplating giving Orlando George and Del Tech their own tax to go along with all the free SEEDS tuition at the expense of competing colleges and universities in the area.

We don't have representative government in this state.

We have two superficially different insider groups dedicated to sharing the spoils.

Comments

I like #3 and #9. Gave me a (sad) smile in a somewhat tedious day.

What to do? I have followed the discussion in previous posts closely.

What to do? The nature of any political organization, or organizations in general for that matter seem to lead to strife, disagreement, and eventual ineffectiveness (I am thinking of Common Cause as an example). Can you address how the inevitable clash of egoes and general crankiness can be managed?
Anonymous said…
"two superficially different insider groups dedicated to sharing the spoils."

Can I use that? Nice.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...