Skip to main content

OK, just to make it official: Dinesh D'Sousa IS an idiot

Not really worth reading, and I can't figure out why AOL keeps him around on a blog (much less promotes him on the home page), where pretty much all he does is shil for his own books.

The most typical lines in The Greatest African-American:

But now there are hardly any Bull Connors and Southern segregationists to fight, and so the activists are reduced to fighting "covert racism" and "institutional racism" and "racism that has gone underground" and basically racism that is only visible to them and to no one else....

The immigrants know that racism today is no longer systematic, it is episodic, and they are able to find ways to navigate around its obstacles....

At the time of his death King was peddling all kinds of impractical schemes for sharing the wealth and he also became unnecessarily involved in the anti-Vietnam movement which diluted his currency as a civil rights leader.


Does Dinesh really believe this crap, or is he (I hope) simply an amoral profiteer who's figured out that saying outrageous things (hello, Ann Coulter!) tricks some people into buying really vapid, meaningless books?

Comments

Bowly said…
I have to give him the systemic vs. episodic part. After all, the sheriff doesn't (typically) help in the lynchings anymore.
I would respectfully disagree.

Not all coercion is physical; nor is all systemic prejudice as obvious as a lynching.

Red-lining certainly still exists, as does significantly discrimination in housing, employment, and even retail service.

I won't say that there hasn't been progress, but to suggest that we've wiped out racism in this country is at best hyperbole.
D'Souza is one of those precocious young things, who, not having lived through a thing, can assure you it was all that bad.

I grew up in the South in the bad old days and while you don't have sheriff's conspiring with the Klan to murder people, there is plenty of racism.

People in the South have accomodated themselves to dealing pleasantly with black coworkers on the job, or being in the same public facilities. They've gotten used to black people occupying economic niches besides maids and warehousemen.

But they don't socialize together.They don't sit together in school lunch rooms. Indeed, look over much of the South and it's remarkable how schools have resegregated.

Members of the same denominations still have separate churches. Economic disparities are much the same by race.

Seeing the Democratic Party going sideways on race in the 1960s, Southern Democrats first went Wallacite, then Republican. Who gets worked up about poke-in-the-eye issues like Confederate state flags, making voting harder to do, welfare queens- it's all in code, like President Bush's recess appointments of appellate judges with dodgy prejudice issues in their confirmation records- on Martin Luther King Jr Day a year or two ago. Or Trent Lott's speech at Strom Thurmond's birthday party.

Indeed, lot of the effects of racism now are those of indifference. Like ward Conerly and other conservatives, the race question has been declared over. We don't have t think about it any more. Everyone is on his own and the genius of the market is that everyone gets an equal chance, and that charity from private sources will dole out mites to those who don't make it.

BTW- I was at a Christmas Party in Birmingham a few years ago. I met an interracial same-sex couple. They own Bull Connor's house. After they moved in, they went out to to Connor's grave, just to listen to him spin.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...