Skip to main content

Scientists report: Aliens avoid us because we're boring


Probably you'd expect this item in the Weekly World News rather than New Scientist, but there you are.

Yet there it is: "ET too bored by Earth transmissions to reply" [8 December 2006].

Canadian astrophysicist Yuvan Dutil and "fellow researcher" Stephane Davis posit the idea that sending out streams of mathematical data already known by any civilization sophisticated enough to receive our signals is a losing proposition.

"The question is, what is interesting to an extraterrestrial?" Dutil told New Scientist. "We think the answer is using some common ground to communicate things about humanity that will be new or different to them – like social features of our society."


Douglas Vakoch, who directs message compilation for SETI (the Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence) agrees that we will need interesting message traffic to catch alien attention, but also points out some problems.

"If someone replies to your message saying, 'I don't understand. Can you repeat that?' it will take decades, centuries or millennia to know," says Vakoch.

"Another approach is to send a lot of stuff and hope there is enough redundancy for them to spot patterns," he adds. "We could just send the encyclopaedia."

Dutil agrees other options are worth exploring, but points out that sometimes only a message will do. "It would make sense to have an 'answer phone' message ready in case we are contacted," he explains, "just to say, 'we'll get back to you,' while we figure out what to do."


I was going to close this with some smart-ass suggestions of what to send--or better yet what NOT to send--but I think I can safely leave that to the creativity of the individual reader.

Comments

Anonymous said…
I think Dutil and Davis are nuts. Aliens would ignore the existence of another intelligent civilization ... because we're boring?? Puh-lease.

The only way this premise works is if intelligent life in the universe is as common as the common cold. And that is highly unlikely.
Unknown said…
IMHO, Hube is slightly lacking in imagination. Supposing we got a call from aliens, we would be over the moon. But if we got 10, it would fade from the front pages. If we got a million, would we bother to reply? After all, we could not meet them for thousands of years. There are trillions of stars and, probably, trillions of aliens. If they all tried to contact us, we would treat them like bugs - ignore them, or kill them - unless they killed us first. Sorry about that.
Regards Ross Milburn

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...