Skip to main content

Why China's coal problem matters to you

The difficulty with understanding issues like global warming (beyond the simplistic Al Gore "the US is the energy satan of the world" interpretation) and the world economy is that, quite simply, most Americans don't have a single damn clue about conditions in other countries.

For example, we hear often enough about China as a growing competitor on the world oil market, which is partly responsible for driving our domestic energy prices up, but do we ever examine the internal energy situation in China?

Again I go back to Al Jazeera:

China is facing its worst-ever power shortage as winter weather puts pressure on dwindling coal supplies.

Officials say reserves are down to emergency levels with only enough coal to power the entire country for another eight days.

According to state media the shortage amounts to nearly 70 gigawatts, equivalent to about the entire generating capacity of the United Kingdom.

Across China 13 provinces including the southern industrial and export hub of Guangdong, have already begun rationing supplies, tiggering brown-outs across large areas.

Coal provides 78 per cent of China's energy needs, and the country is the world's biggest producer and consumer of coal.


Despite the opening of at least one new coal-fired power plant per week, China cannot keep up with the demand for energy produced by rising consumer expectations and made worse by government attempts to control energy prices.

Analysts say the problem largely stems from Beijing's attempts to control inflation and avoid social unrest by controlling the price of some types of energy, like power, while allowing others like coal to be liberalised.

That has been further compounded by the winter snows which are hampering transportation of coal supplies from the coal producing areas to the power plants.

With the government unlikely to lift caps on electricity prices any time soon, the impact of the coal shortage could spread to other markets.


Why should you care? Aside from the object lesson--ala California a couple years back--that government energy regulation (especially price caps) is almost always disastrous in the long run, here's why:

In summer 2004, during China's biggest previous power shortage, a rush for individual generators and diesel to run them helped push up international oil prices.


The more you know, the scarier the future looks some days.

Comments

Anonymous said…
"most Americans don't have a single damn clue about conditions in other countries."

A growing problem! People here just don't realize how good they have it. It seems the Socialists want more for the poor who are already richer than most of the world, and the Fascists want the richest of the rich (or the Government) to get richer.

For years the Gov. of China did not install heat in many houses built south of Beijing because they did not consider it got cold enough to warrant such a luxury. A friends Dad is an entrepreneur who has a BMW in the driveway of his unheated house. About now they are burning whatever they can find, including cow dung, to heat the house.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...