Skip to main content

Shootings at Northern Illinois University: If you think you know, you don't....

The details that are still way too sketchy as I write this will have been fleshed out soon enough: at least six are known dead in the shooting at Northern Illinois University.

We have all become somewhat jaded as news junkies these days, but in awhile even this will fade into a passing reference, as did Columbine, Virginia Tech, and Delaware State. Politicians from both parties, either in the state or nationally, will be unable to resist the urge to cash in on the violence in order to support one or another causes--from stricter gun control to more pro-active counseling services--and there will be the usual media circus at a time when the people affected most need the solace of some simple privacy.

I can predict, with absolute certainty, that tonight a reporter from some Philadelphia or Baltimore station will be trying to dig up someone local at DSU to comment on this tragedy, creating the ultimate granfalloon [if you never read early Kurt Vonnegut, that's your problem] out of similar institutional victims.

An event like this can tear the guts out of any community, but a university is more fragile than a similarly sized small town. The ties that bind us together as a community are more tenuous, and more temporary than those of real communities. Professors know and treasure their students, but only for a few years, and these days we rarely get to know their families in the bargain. Some students, some teachers, some staff members, can never--for whatever reason--face returning to the scene. They drift away and the pieces of their lives are never quite put back in place.

In many cases, after the initial emotional family-like rallies and coming-together events, there is a backlash, almost a whiplash back toward pointing fingers and suddenly being suspicious of people you once welcomed with open arms.

Ironically--and terribly--the tragedy at Northern Illinois University will improve the ability of places like Virginia Tech and DSU to get past, in an institutional sense, the stigma attached to having nationally reported fatal shootings happen on their campuses. Because the more places it happens, the more strangely and horridly normal it seems to calculate in the risk that your son or daughter might be gunned down in pursuit of a college education.

At DSU we have genuinely attempted to learn the lessons that can be gleaned from such tragedy: we have better reporting systems, better emergency protocols, and talk about fostering more mentoring relationships, building a campus climate that will make violence intolerable....

But we all know--like all women who have ever been sexually assaulted know (in much greater depth and detail)--that it can happen again, at any time, and that it can come from strangers or people we thought were our friends.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...