Skip to main content

John McCain : Wit and Class

Maybe it was because of all the tension in this crazy campaign season, but I literally laughed out loud through this whole thing when I saw it last night.

(Towards the end of the 1st clip he hilariously roasts MSNBC and its Lead McCain Basher - Keith Olbermann).


Say what you will about John McCain but the man has a great sense of humor and his parting words about Senator Obama show class through and through...

The last minute (after he praises Senator Obama) is priceless.



Comments

Jeremy Filliben said…
This was without a doubt the funniest thing I've seen this election cycle. Thanks for posting!
Anonymous said…
BOTH of them were very funny. I love that Obama said that contrary to popular opinion, he was not born in a manger. He was, in fact born on Krypton, and was sent by his Dad, Jar-El, to save Earth.
Hube said…
Uh, Geek -- that'd be JOR-El. C'mon, get it RIGHT!!

(I'm geekier than you.)
Tyler Nixon said…
Humor is not Obama's strong suit, Geek. I think we can all admit that. I thought his closing comments were excellent and moving.
Anonymous said…
I thought is was an extension of the debate.
It made more sense than the debates.
Now If McCain could project himself in that light, more than 'serious', he would impress those who read body language.
[ Insult intended for those who 'read minds and secret intentions, and know what people REALLY mean.'. ]
Paul
Tyler Nixon said…
Amen to your sentiment about body language critics re: McCain. Give me an effing break with such heel-biting dreck.

McCain is a jovial person who is not afraid to use occasional goofy facial expressions, whether in reaction or to make light of a moment.

I can relate to this very human trait in myself and friends. We crack each other up and it is an endearing and genuine.

I guess if smooth perfection is one's bag, no one with a sense of humor and self-effacing physicality could ever measure up. Nuts to that.
Anonymous said…
I laughed at both performances. Some really great lines last night.

And while I agree that the body language is not fair, it does exist... just ask Al Gore.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...