Skip to main content

More on the Hope(less)* Commission

* Hat tip to longtime city activist and a good friend, Susan Regis Collins, for this apt moniker.

1. Today on delawaretalkradio.com Mike Matthews will be discussing the Wilmington Hope Commission on DownWithAbsolutes Radio from 3-5 pm. Mike has asked me to call in to discuss. I urge others to join in.

2. From Today's News-Journal - Wilmington City Council members call for police state tactics - demand police start "knocking heads" and "shaking down" criminal suspects, (presumably). Prado says civil liberties not his concern, invites litigation against the city as an acceptable price. Chief Sczerba wisely says civil liberties will not be tossed aside.

"
WILMINGTON -- Gunfire on Sunday afternoon killed one man, injured two and tied a 12-year-old record for most shootings in the city in a year." ###

"They need to do what they need to do and knock some heads," said Councilman Samuel Prado, D-5th District. "We need to go after these troublemakers. We can't let people hide behind civil liberties. I would worry about the civil liberties later, and let's get the situation under control first. If it means going to court, we'd better get a good lawyer."

[Hope Commissioner] Police Chief Michael Szczerba said the city would not sacrifice civil liberties to make more arrests.

"That won't happen," he said. "We can operate within the law just fine. We'll continue to police in the same aggressive, assertive manner that we have all along.

The first shooting happened when one man approached another man along Fourth Street, a busy thoroughfare through the city. They began talking. Moments later, the suspect pulled a handgun from his waistband and fired at least seven shots, hitting the victim twice in the chest.

Down Fourth Street, one of the bullets struck a second man, grazing his skull. His injury was not life-threatening and he was later released from the hospital.

The second shooting happened on the other side of the city, and police had few details to release Sunday evening.

[Hope Commissioner] Public Safety Director James Mosely said many officers already are walking the streets and he'd love to see more.

[Hope Commissioner] The Rev. Derrick Johnson, pastor of Joshua Harvest Church and a member of the anti-violence Wilmington Hope Commission, said he visited both shooting scenes Sunday to pray with neighbors and try to quell any talk of retaliation. Johnson said leaders must address poverty, drugs and other root causes of violence.

Prado and Councilman Kevin F. Kelley Sr., D-6th District, said they were disturbed by the brazen nature of the shootings, which happened on a warm autumn afternoon with many people around, unlike the majority of shootings, which happen at night.

"It says these criminals have no fear," Prado said.

Kelley joined Prado in calling for more aggressive policing. "You need to take Lancaster to Sixth and Union to Jackson and just lock that area down," Kelley said. "You need to start shaking people down and taking back the streets."

3. Nancy Willing has a round up of the issue over at Delaware Way, with some very thoughtful observations from Cassandra Marshall (cassandra m) of Delaware Liberal and a fiery letter to the News-Journal from my good friend Bob Dalton (of Wilmington sidewalk fight fame)

4. Call the Mayor's Office today (302) 576-2100 and leave a voice mail letting them know that he needs to shut down the wasteful "Hope" Commission and stop wasting taxpayer money on this nanny-crony boondoggle.


Comments

Brian Shields said…
Holy S#!t

I understand the frustration, but the extreme of locking down an area of a city is absolutely reprehensible. He was basically advocating creating a limited area police state because of an increase in crime.

Kudos to the Police Chief for understanding the limits of his power.

Sheesh.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...