Skip to main content

A note for Pandora

A few days ago you posted a very personal and very thoughtful piece on the Difference Between Health Care and Health Insurance. It was an excellent, and thought-provoking piece on what's wrong with the current system.

For me it was a problem in that I either had to skip replying or write something far too lengthy to go into the comments section.

So I didn't reply. But I have been working on a fairly lengthy response that I think might surprise you. Real life being what it is, however, this one is requiring some research and may take at least another week to show up.

Just didn't want you to think I missed it.
Labels:

Comments

Anonymous said…
Thanks, Steve. I can't wait to read your post.

After I wrote that post I thought of another personal incident...

We had planned on a normal delivery when my son was born. Unfortunately, the baby went into fetal distress and my blood pressure crashed. As I was rushed into surgery - uncertain what was going to happen to me or my baby - I kept telling my husband to call our insurance company.

You see, in order to have a C-section (scheduled or emergency) covered we had to notify the insurance company within 24 hours of the procedure. What a disgrace. I'm sure this helped my blood pressure. God, I was nuts... and young... and broke.
November 19, 2008 at 1:37 PM
Anonymous said…
Steve-So glad you are preparing a piece. I too saw the entry, and all I had time to do was harrumph. It was provocative, but not excellent; and I do fear those who think even the best European models will work are woefully misinformed. What people forget is Americans are demanding consumers. They will be the first to scream when placed in a ward of 4-8 other patients, and the bathroom is down the hall. Then the nut says well, we can have them pay extra if they want a private room or upgrade. Give that 2 years, then we have people screaming we discriminate against the poor, and everyone deserves a private room! And on and on from there. Americans need to be informed what is really necessary; and I don't think our spoiled egocentric way of life can fit into any model of universal healthcare. They will demand annual mammograms, and prostate screenings for people well up in age; when other countries wouldn't even bother. Our adolescent population would have to forego the Holy Grail of acne medication, Accutane, at a consumer cost of 1300 bucks per round, until our demanding public had insurance cover it as a regular prescription. No, America is ready for whatever universal or socialized, or inclusive, or single payor, healthcare for everyone else, except their situation. What I would encourage is coverage for universally accepted pro-active public policy initiatives. We should not be paying for childhood immunizations, birth control alternatives, and a select few other things. But I really don't want to be picking up the tab for cancer care, heart disease etc. We will all die from something, and sometimes you just have to go with it. Now, that's why we have insurance. But Americans just don't get it; and want every skintag removed. Good luck with your research. I'm keeping my US healthplan, and don't mind that deductible, for what I have gotten in return over the years-in good health and bad.
November 19, 2008 at 7:29 PM
Anonymous said…
Anxiously awaiting the healthcare piece.
November 23, 2008 at 2:31 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...
44 comments
Read more

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...
70 comments
Read more

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...
31 comments
Read more