Skip to main content

I Do Not Trust This Illinois Democrat


Barack Obama Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel's entire adult life appears to be driven to serve his own personal accumulation of wealth and power.

If he played any part in taking down Democrat Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich, it is laughable to think it was a matter of public integrity or conscience.

If anything it was pure self-protection, looking after his power franchise, perhaps with a little dash of taking down an inconvenient Illinois Democrat thus creating an advantageous power vacuum easily filled by Emanuel-Obama loyalists.

ProPublica's Ben Profess has penned an interesting glimpse at what a ruthlessly self-serving DC/Wall Street wheeler-dealer Emanuel is :

Rahmbo's Revolving Door

Rahmbo's Revolving Door Revisited

Rahmbo's Revolving Door : Take 3

I think Obama's going to see a lot of problems eventually arise from what will be going on under his radar with mercenary Clintonistas like Emanuel run amok in his White House...right at the top.

Dare I say it will begin immediately with campaign finance, since we are unlikely to see all that astounding 2008 campaign "grass roots" money flowing again to Obama, after 3+ years in office takes the bloom plenty off his rose.

Obamamanuel will need huge money to capture a second term and I have no doubt Emanuel's ilk will do whatever it takes to secure their bankroll from the usual big money suspects looking for some of that good ole inside-the-beltway love.


I hope Obama doesn't also adopt the Clintons' smoke-and-mirrors scandal response playbook, heavy on faux-outrage and shrill diversionary partisan attacks.... of course, all through proxies....like Emanuel was to the Clintons.

Comments

Delaware Watch said…
We all know this routine: Democrats are not allowed to be successful in business, only Republicans are. It's prime facie suspicious in the former case but not in the latter.
Tyler Nixon said…
Business? No.

Wall Street-DC influence peddling and cashing in? Yes.

BTW, where did I say anything about Republicans? To me, the whole Bush administration was filled with people like Rahm Emanuel.
Tyler Nixon said…
Also did you read the links about how he was "successful in business"?

He was successful alright...in enriching himself.

As far as "business", what did he create of value, if anything?

Personal wealth creation and business ain't the same thing.
Brian Miller said…
"Business" involves the creation of value in the marketplace, which receives an excess of private money in voluntary payments versus what was expended to produce the value in question.

It is NOT a series of cushy jobs through political favors.

Incidentally, it's rather silly to bring up the "but Republicans do it too" argument here -- I, at least, will readily acknowledge that the Republicans are at least as scummy as the Democrats on this issue (and many others).

I'd urge Democrats to hold themselves to higher standards than "the GOP does it too!"

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...