Skip to main content

Is Health Care America's New Political Third Rail?

It used to be that any attempt to so much as breath a whiff about reforming, changing, or even discussing reform or change of "Social Security", the massive Ponzi-scheme social welfare entitlement system set up by the Democrat Party a half century ago, meant something near political suicide, at least amongst the American government, political, and media establishments.

Social Security has never been reformed, because it can never really be fixed. It is a fundamental failure that is openly-acknowledged as utterly unsustainable no matter how much money the welfare statists print and throw down the tube to sustain it. It's demise is inevitable, but hopefully not as just another casualty of the total collapse of our economic system under the weight of Leviathan's bottomless bloat.

The hysterical, fear-mongering decades-running sandbag defense of this scam of a ruse of 'security' in elder years, brought to you by our efficient, benevolent federal overseers, was a potent force for many years.

But has the wider public now gained an intuitive understanding from this runaway trainwreck of a system that letting the camel's nose under the tent on issues of such broad and deep impact on the country will soon follow with the whole hungry camel lodged in your living room?

I think so. I think we are seeing the latest exercise in the reality that attempting to impose "health care reform" on America by federal government fiat is the new third rail American politics.

It is fitting that instead of this third rail shocking those who would reduce or end government's control over a broad social good (such as by halting an unsustainable federal dole of across-the-board old-age financial entitlement, deceptively dubbed "Social Security"), instead it is administering rapid political jolts those who seek political control over the even broader and more endemic social good of health care.

Bill Clinton got instant karma, in political terms, for manipulation, monomaniacal arrogance, and partisan warfare as tools to make the federal government the omnipotent force in our country's health care "system". Clinton's hubris and unwelcome paternalistic excess cost his party their 40-year run controlling 1/2 or all of the United States Congress, before he had even reached 2 years in office.

I was lucky enough in January 1995 to be sitting on the floor of the House amidst the new Republican majority when Clinton announced the end to big government's "era", in his State of the Union address. Ashame that new Republican majority didn't hold him to it, before devolving into their own federal power binge under the autocrat Bush....leading to their recent political demise.

But the worm can turn fast in political terms....if opponents repeat or, better, magnify their mistakes. Barack Obama looks to be headed on that same 1st-term Clinton trajectory, but with even more gusto.....grasping that third rail, locked arm-in-arm with his and his party's entire identity and credibility at stake.

We'll see if the GOP and the broad range of other (non-political) forces marshaling against the ObamaCare Nightmare will repeat the same mistakes as the last beneficiaries of the public's punishment of the last unitary Democrat majority and their mania to assert federal control over something as profound as the health of each and every citizen in the land.

I hope the forces of limited, accountable government finally have the day and win out over the welfare statists, trite central planners and their legion of enablers cocooned inside the D.C. beltway.

Comments

Anonymous said…
What the hell is wrong with social security you morons. We pay into social security for our old age so we who didnt gross millions have food and living expenses. Damn if you fools think you can win votes by going after social security, do you want to have euthanisa as a methodology for dealing with old age? What the hell is your plan for health care reform, keep letting the for profits steal all our funds, so they can pay CEO's, shareholders and beancounters huge salaries and commission delivering nothing towards health care. You were wrong about Iraq, wrong about torture, wrong about the Banksters, wrong about taking regulations off the bankers, credit card companies, while the lot of them drove the country into bankruptcy. Now you want to get rid of "entitlements" the only mechanism which keeps our elderly, poor, disabled in survival mode? Are you just a bunch of satanists?

C Street and The Family has control of your freaking brains. C Street believed in Hitler and Chairman Mao. Why Mao? Because he had the little red book everyone carried with the rules, if you go against the rules...you go to jail. Critical and free thinkers would send you right to re-education camps under Mao. Please do tell us what you think of those Congressman/Senators who believe they are above ALL laws...even Gods law...because they are put in those seats by God, therfore you can commit murder, adultry, violate Consitution, violate UN treaties and international law, engage in torture, bribery and other heinous crimes...but oh my GOD lets not reign in the 1% of the elitists, corporate billionaires...you are their side?
Anonymous said…
You are a Professor? What do you teach? If this is the garbage you are teaching our kids, its no wonder we have the most uneducated, ill informed population?

Are you a teabagger? Do you stand with the crazy lunatic from Sussex, who says, "an angel came to her and told her that aliens were in America"? Is this what the republican party has come down too?

Where do you get your health care information? World Net Daily, Cato Insitute? If you are healthy now which most people are in their 30's and 40's, cant wait till you 50 and start dealing with real health care issues, then perhaps you can begin to understand how "real people are hurting" from this free market, for profit health care system bankrupting this country. Fools, and nuts putting out the most vile information and calling yourself a liberaterian is the worst form of hypocrisy.
Anonymous said…
Now there is a rational, well stated argument!
Anonymous said…
BTW, this revamping of healthcare is going to be about as successful as the war on drugs!
Tyler Nixon said…
I'm all for social security NOT entitlement.

It is impossible to fathom how perverse is a government-run old-age entitlement system funded most crushingly on the backs of young, lower-income wage-earners...for which even Warren Buffett is entitled to collect.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...