Skip to main content

I make the papers...

... in my alter-ego secret identity as DSU faculty union chair, commenting on the loooooonnnnnggggg wait between the on-campus interviews for new Presidential candidates and action by the Board of Trustees.

Thanks, Rachel.

Comments

Nancy Willing said…
I missed your name when I scanned it earlier. I called my DSU alum friend and we both like Leon.
Friend said that Harry still hasn't moved his family to DE in over a year and that he's threatened to pick up stakes and quit if he isn't chosen.
What's up with that? That means that you'll need to search for a provost right away if you pick Leon. Maybe that's not a bad thing.
Nancy
I need to correct two inaccuracies in your comment.

1) Harry's family hasn't moved to Delaware because at virtually the same time he was appointed Provost his wife (who has her own career) accepted an Asst. VP position at a college in NC which would allow their son to continue in his same middle school to the end of the 8th Grade.

2) Harry has NEVER threatened to pull up stakes and quit if he isn't chosen. This is pure and utter bullshit, and I challenge you to provide a source for that or take back the comment. What he did say is that he has focused his career on eventually becoming a university president, and that if it doesn't happen here it will happen somewhere else.

I work with Harry on a daily basis and whether or not he deserves to be president he damn sure doesn't deserve this sort of slander.

As for Nunery, why don't you dig into his quickly canceled no-bid $95,000 consulting contract he received from the Phila School District after not being selected as the new superintendent or his actual role in the Edison Schools debacle between 2005-2008?
Nancy Willing said…
I won't provide the source of my 'information' but I certainly will forward the corrections.

Look at it this way, Steve. Without this exchange, the truth would have had only one 'face' that of my alum friend.

I don't have a dog in this fight.
Nancy
You're right and I'm sorry if I sounded too brusque.

I'm tired of the fact that I usually cannot say anything when good people get smeared.

Thank you for being willing to go back and tell the alum what's up--but I will be you that he or she brushes it off.
Nancy Willing said…
I have every intention of reporting back to you what reactions I get. I sent an email last night.

These are serious differences of view and need to be cleared up ASAP.
Nancy Willing said…
FTR, my alum friend forwarded to me his email to Steve that was in response to having emailed him this blog post commentary. Whatever discussion was forthcoming between them hasn't been relayed to me.
Nancy
Like you I have not been given permission to publish the name of your contact.

That said, we did speak (and you have a point I should have mentioned it last week; sorry).

I confronted the allegations directly, pointed out that they were based on rumor, incompletely/inaccurately reported statements to which this person was not a witness (and to which I was), and that they contradicted everything Dr Williams has said in 16 months here.

I asked the person to stop spreading this interpretation, not because of support for Dr Williams, but because it amounts to a lie.

I have received no assurances that these rumors will cease.

If they do not, I will continue to contradict them with the truth, because they are pernicious--having already reached the ears of members of the Board because that person placed them there without verifying them.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...