Skip to main content

Instant Justice Can Really Sting

This was sent to me. Probably quite a bit embellished, but hilarious nonetheless...

"FROM AN ACTUAL CRAIG'S LIST PERSONALS AD"

To the Guy Who Tried to Mug Me in Downtown Savannah night before last.
Date: 2009-05-27, 1:43 a.m. E.S.T.

I was the guy wearing the black Burberry jacket that you demanded that I hand over, shortly after you pulled the knife on me and my girlfriend, threatening our lives.

You also asked for my girlfriend's purse and earrings. I can only hope that you somehow come across this rather important message.

First, I'd like to apologize for your embarrassment; I didn't expect you to actually crap in your pants when I drew my pistol after you took my jacket.

The evening was not that cold, and I was wearing the jacket for a reason. My girlfriend had just bought me that Kimber Model 1911 .45 ACP pistol for my birthday, and we had picked up a shoulder holster for it that very evening. Obviously you agree that it is a very intimidating weapon when pointed at your head ...isn't it?!

I know it probably wasn't fun walking back to wherever you'd come from with that brown sludge in your pants. I'm sure it was even worse walking bare-footed since I made you leave your shoes, cell phone, and wallet with me. [That prevented you from calling or running to your buddies to come help mug us again].

After I called your mother, or "Momma" as you had her listed in your cell, I explained the entire episode of what you'd done. Then I went and filled up my gas tank as well as those of four other people in the gas station -- on your credit card. The guy with the big motor home took 150 gallons and was extremely grateful!

I gave your shoes to a homeless guy outside Vinnie Van Go Go's, along with all the cash in your wallet. [That made his day!]

I then threw your wallet into the big pink "pimp mobile" that was parked at the curb ...after I broke the windshield and side window and keyed the entire driver's side of the car.

Later, I called a bunch of phone sex numbers from your cell phone. Ma Bell just now shut down the line, although I only used the phone for a little over a day now, so what's going on with that?

Earlier, I managed to get in two threatening phone calls to the DA's office and one to the FBI, while mentioning President Obama as my possible target.

The FBI guy seemed really intense and we had a nice long chat (I guess while he traced your number etc.).

In a way, perhaps I should apologize for not killing you ...but I feel this type of retribution is a far more appropriate punishment for your threatened crime.

I wish you well as you try to sort through some of these rather immediate pressing issues, and can only hope that you have the opportunity to reflect upon, and perhaps reconsider, the career path you've chosen to pursue in life. Remember, next time you might not be so lucky.

Have a good day!

Thoughtfully yours,
Alex

P.S. Remember this motto ...An armed society makes for a more civil society!

Comments

Delaware Dem said…
LOL. This story is most likely bulls*t after the gun is pulled. But really, what part about the gun owner's actions after he sent the mugger away can be described as civil? More like childish retribution. A real man pulls the gun and retains the perp while the cops are called. And a real man does not brag his heroism to whatever Gun Nut weekly this Penthouse letter was sent to.
I can only hope that this is true :))
Delaware Watch said…
The man who pulled the gun turns out to be a bigger criminal than the man who pulled the knife. And Tyler Nixon thinks the actions of the man who pulled the gun are commendable.
Anonymous said…
Again, no sense of humor from the left.
Tyler Nixon said…
So true, anonymous.

Dana - do you always do to others what you cry hysterically about when you think someone has done it to you?

As you would surely respond, were you on the receiving end of this remark of yours (that makes you a patent hypocrite, in addition to a humorless dolt) :

'Prove where I ever "commended" this person. You are lying!!'

I almost wrote in the post "This guy sure cut his own swath of criminality". But I accepted the whole thing as humorous fantasy and let it be. But of course, leave it to the professor to turn humor into a phony potshot...
Delaware Watch said…
"I almost wrote in the post "This guy sure cut his own swath of criminality"."

Bullcrap, Tyler. If you had been joking, you wouldn't have written this which YOU BELIEVE: "Remember this motto ...An armed society makes for a more civil society!"

Now admit it. You do believe that quaint little motto, don't you?

You are not fooling me.
Tyler Nixon said…
That last one has to be one of Dana Garrett's more ridiculous comments ever. Truly asinine.

As Dana himself would respond to such a comment as his last :

"PROOF? You're making things up. I have never said I believe such a thing. You're a liar!"

For the record, I don't even believe there is such a thing as an "armed society".

It bespeaks his woeful AND purposeful lack of understanding that Dana Garrett would think that I, as a libertarian, would conflate the presence (or not) of any number of "armed" individuals into some ethereal notion of an armed (or unarmed) "society".

Seriously, Dana, you should find better avenues project your collectivist mentality than such trivialities as a purely amusing verbatim re-posting of an outlandish craig's list ad.
Mike W. said…
Obviously Dana can't take a joke...
Unknown said…
STAND IN FAITH EVEN WHEN YOU'RE HAVING THE HARDEST TIME OF YOUR LIFE :)
imarksweb.net
imarksweb.net

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...