Skip to main content

Serious question: will this be considered a racist statement?

In a WaPo story criticizing the Obama administration for a long series of mistakes in Israeli-Palestinian diplomacy, this sentence appears:

Daniel Levy, a veteran Israeli peace negotiator now at the Century Foundation in Washington, summed up the administration's efforts in recent days as "amateur night at the Apollo Theater."


Given that the Apollo Theater is one of the historic landmarks of African-American culture....

On the other hand, you can't lampoon the Century Foundation as rightwing...

And Daniel Levy cannot be written off as some hardline conservative....

So in the good spirits of "see, Hube, I found one before you did [finally]" I have to wonder how this one will be treated by the pundits. If at all.
Labels:

Comments

Brian Shields said…
Would that comment had made any sense if it was referencing GW Bush?

In my eyes, it would hold a different meaning, and would sound like it was a race-pointed comment.

Racist? Eh.. No hate spouted off, nothing derogatory.

Does it point to the possibility of racist thinking.. oh hell yeah.
November 6, 2009 at 1:41 AM
Hube said…
Post-racial America my ass. ;-)
November 6, 2009 at 2:27 PM
Chris Slavens said…
Despite alluding to black Americans, the remark doesn't imply inferiority, and therefore isn't racist. Would it be racist to call the former Bush administration a rodeo, or call him a cowboy? Simply because there aren't many blacks that are into rodeos and country n' western music? Some people are far too sensitive to stereotypes. My family name is originally from Ireland, but I won't be offended if you offer me a pint of Guinness.

The three best-known racists in America today all have names preceded by "The Reverend".
November 6, 2009 at 5:57 PM
RSmitty said…
Well, depending on how the beholder intends to interpret it, such as do they want to inflict harm on the quote-owner or not, will result in the level of racism this holds.

That said, the equivalency within your scenario does have some consideration. What also should be considered, but wasn't presented, is that Amateur Night at the Apollo was (is?) one of, if not THE premier amateur stage act nights this country has ever known. It's run the gamut from superstars-in-the-rough to flat-out bombs.

Just something to consider.
November 6, 2009 at 10:49 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...
44 comments
Read more

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...
70 comments
Read more

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...
31 comments
Read more