Skip to main content

An Announcement of Sorts: Or, I take a new position coordinating the Gary Johnson campaign in Delaware

Governor Gary Johnson, the
best-qualified candidate for
President this year in any party.
I don't believe the Libertarian Party has ever had a presidential candidate as qualified as former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson.

Frankly, I don't think that--assuming he makes it onto the Presidential Debate stage in the Fall (and that is certainly not a done deal)--either President Obama or Governor Romney will appear any more qualified for the office.

Johnson was a two-term Governor, who inherited a $300 million deficit and left the state with a $1 billion surplus.  He never raised taxes.  He vetoed 750 spending bills.  He increased teacher pay.  He cleaned up bad environmental spills.  His state had the best job creation record in the country.

He's qualified.

He's also different.  Johnson tried for the GOP nomination, but couldn't get any traction.

Small wonder.

He opposes US military adventures abroad, and would slash the defense budget by 43% in order to help balance the Federal budget.

He would order the troops out of Afghanistan on day one of his administraition.

He would audit the Fed and return it to exercising only the powers under its original charter.

He would create a path to citizenship for undocumented workers.

He supports marijuana legalization and marriage equality.

He would eliminate the US Department of Education, block grant the money to the States, and get the Feds the hell out of our public schoosls.

He would replace the income tax and most other taxes with a consumption tax (the Flat Tax) that include "pre-bates" for those at or below the poverty line.

He has a rational plan for reforming Social Security.

Find out more at Gary Johnson 2012.

Right now he's pollng at 6-9% in various places around the country, and at about 6-7% nationally.

Of course, most polling organizations are not using his name at all.

There are those who would tell me I should only support a candidate with a chance of winning.

If Gary gets into the debates, I think he has a chance--a very long chance, but a real one as the only other candidate besides Obama and Romney who will appear on ballots nationwide.

Why?

Because he's the only one saying anything different on the issues.

We have no money, and an unlikely coalition of people who really believe Gary has a shot at being President, people who believe he'll be able to change the debate, and others who simply think that in 2012 a protest vote might finally be in order.

So we will have to see what we can do with imagination.

Undoubtedly a Quixotic quest in a life spent tilting at windmills, but I do feel better about having a candidate in whom I believe and trust.

Comments

Dana Garrett said…
Congradts, Steve.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...

Soda tax debate reveals fundamental progressive assertions about your lack of individual rights and the "responsiblities" of the State

I thought it would be at least amusing to use the Delawareliberal comments as sub-headings regarding each category of what is wrong with the proposed tax on sodas and juice drinks. But there are so many different little strands of each comment that it would be impossible to pull them all out. So, instead, I'm going to let you read them in more or less the order they appeared, and note the assumptions. pandora: I’m perfectly okay with taxing sodas and juice drinks. Mainly because they’re total crap, and one of the main reasons our country’s children are overweight. They are also dirt cheap. Assumptions here: (1) Because "I" am perfectly okay with a new tax it should be imposed on everybody; (2) it is the government's responsibility to keep children from being obese; (3) the cheapness of the product to be taxed justifies charging people more for it. John Manifold: Soda fattens your kids [and you and your husband], shortens their lives, costs more than water [a...