Skip to main content

We've tried GOPers, we've tried Dems, and personal wealth still took a 40% hit. Time to try something else.

Here's why you cannot go with the status quo this year for President:

1.  Personal wealth in this country declined 40% from 2007-2010, thanks to Dems and GOPers.

2.  Dem and GOPer intransigence in Congress will lead to a $405 billion (minimum) tax increase on 150,000,000 households at the beginning of next year.

Here's the money quote from the Kansas City Star:

What the GOP wants just won’t fly. What the Democrats want in no way addresses the scale of the problem.

Read more here: http://www.kansascity.com/2012/06/10/3643011/commentary-taxmageddon-on-the.html#storylink=cpy

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, expecting different results.

This also applies to voting as if Dem and GOPer were your only two choices.

Comments

Eric Dondero said…
Actually No. We haven't "tried GOPers."

Even when Bush was President and the Republicans held majorities in the House and Senate, they were very slender majorities at best. Not too mention, that majority in the Senate last a grand total of 6 months. Remember Jumpin' Jim Jeffords?

The problem isn't that we have "tried the GOP"; rather, problem is we have yet to have a GOP with sufficient majorities in the House and Senate to overcome statist Democrats wanting to block GOP initiatives.

Remember Bush's Cato-based Social Security privatzation proposal in 2005. The Dems made sure it was Dead on Arrival, lambasting it as "extreme" in the media.

If you want progress for Liberty, there's a simple solution: Elect very large Republican majorites in Congress, with a large libertarian contingent, (including dual party Libertarian Party/Republican Party members.)
kavips said…
Steve is right.

Gop is worthless, whiney and only interested in taking money away from the middle class and sequestering it among the wealth.

The gop is morally bankrupt. The gop is used up. The gop cannot put one thought in front of another.

Oh.. go ahead.. blame the Dems. Blah, blah, blah....

Exactly the problem. The GOP cannot sell itself because it is empty air. They have only one line... uhhh.. "we're not democrats..."


Well, I'm sick of it. I'm tired of hearing the same line with not one single positive result since it was first uttered by one of Ronald Reagan's campaign managers back in 78...(just curious, Eric D., were you alive back then?) ummm I think his name was Dick Cheney...

It does not work. It has never worked.

And Gary Johnson is interesting simply because, as a Republican, he made it work... in New Mexico..

Someone actually made something work. AND THE REPUBLICANS THREW HIM OUT OF THEIR PARTY!!!!!!!!!!!

After that, nothing any republican can EVER, EVER, EVER, EVER, EVER say, has any credibility...

Hello, Mr. Republican... any neurons still working in there?

lol.

(not meant personally, of course.) Just speaking in generalities....
Dana Garrett said…
I am not sure that a desirable alternate to the GOP or the Dems is a party whose members seriously consider abolishing minimum wage laws and one of whose intellectual inspirations actually said of a libertarian capitalist society "Above all we must recognize that we may be free yet miserable" (Hayek). Trying selling those grim potential realities to a people whose standard of living has been in steady decline for 30 plus years. Widespread pauperism is hardly the antidote to recession.
Will McVay said…
Yes, Dana, better we should continue telling the unemployed that they can't earn enough, so they're not allowed to get a job.

Also, Eric Dondero is an idiot.
Unknown said…
For all of the Dems and Reps out there, I've got some monochrome CRT's you will find useful. As in any old tired technology we feel a pang of sentimentality as we see old ideas shed into the dustbin of history. Some things cannot be upgraded they're just too old, slow and don't work anymore. The new political technology is redefining communication, collaboration, collective discussion and action. With new technology comes the responsibility to catch unintended consequences as they arise. Because the new program is fast and new and useful.
I'm sorry old-timey parties. You are quickly losing relevance in a world where your lies and corruption can be routed out in nanoseconds. You're just not up to the rebuild and the power supply is fading. It's time to break you down and salvage what we can of your base elements.
You were once the driver of our hopes and passions, but now you chug along selling the same old drivel that no longer compiles. Just too many bugs and dropped routines.
We will miss you as we fondly remember an old 8-track tape player. Nice and interesting then but a pain in the ass now. We'll just put you on the shelf so we can remember all your joys and faults. A new age is here, you just haven't recognized it yet.
You see, that is what a paradigm change is all about. You know.. At first they laugh at you, then they fight you, then -- you know the rest. You're not late to the party, you just weren't invited.
It's just a rumbling now, but more can hear it everyday. Laugh, go ahead, enjoy your swan song. It's all you have left.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...

The disturbing decline of the Delaware blogosphere: a very unfortunate Around the Horn (even if it's not Friday)

I've noticed a change in my own blog-checking habits over the past several weeks, and I don't know if it's just me or the reality of the last month of a divisive political campaign. I automatically used to check out Delawareliberal first and several times a day, because it was where I could find edgy, thought-provoking, and (dare I say it) funny banter going on. These days visit several other spots first, and my visits to DL are both shorter and less engaged. Why? Because the combination of invading neo-con commenters with the stridency of some of the major contributors has led to such pleasant exchanges as a post dedicated to labeling another blogger racist by donviti, whose own sense of provocative humor is generally so far out there that he makes John Belushi doing Samurai bartender on the SNL look positively pro-Asian. Or I can find Delawaredem and jason periodically spewing the idea that anybody who is not a liberal or progressive Democrat is somehow a non-American,...