Fighting back for ballot access: We will be as imaginative as we have to be

You may recall that the Michigan Secretary of State Ruth Johnson is the GOPer trying to invoke an arcane "sore loser" law to keep Libertarian Presidential candidate Gary Johnson off the ballot. You may also recall that this is a purely political move, because the law has never been interpreted that way before, and was in fact interpreted to allow John Anderson to run in 1980 after having been in the GOP Primary.

So, yes, the Libertarian Party of Michigan will sue if necessary, but how's this for a creative solution.

The LPM has found another "Gary E. Johnson" to run as the party's candidate. This one is a longtime Texas Libertarian, who just happens to share the same name (down to the middle initial) with the former New Mexico governor. He has agree to sign the papers to be the Libertarian Party's nominee in Michigan only. The electors will then be pledged to him, not Governor Gary Earl Johnson.

Of course, should Johnson (which one?) manage to win Michigan, the electors are legally free to vote for the national Libertarian candidate.

We should not have to do this in a republic of laws, but we have allowed the two parties to shut down virtually every avenue of reasonable competition.

So, we'll fight back, with whatever legal tactics we need to use.

Comments

Will McVay said…

Good idea. Sounds familiar.

June 5, 2012 at 9:26 PM

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here: chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.” The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point: Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo: Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1. Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...

Search This Blog