Skip to main content

Democratic Underground: Libertarian sodomy and the freedom to live without working

This has to be one of the more bizarre posts I've read, even for Democratic Underground, ending this way:

For almost two decades, roughly two-thirds of the American public have supported what we’d call a moderate European welfare state—putting the average U.S. citizen significantly to the left of the Democratic party... 
But hey, our ruling class would shit a brick if any of that wealth redistribution stuff happened over here. Which is why “this is a center-right nation” has been a favorite Fox News talking point for over ten years...But libertarianism? Our ruling class is totally fine with that. Smoke your reefer and sodomize whomever you please, just keep your mouth shut and hand over your Social Security account. 
Here’s the real reason libertarians hate the idea. The welfare state is a check against servility towards the rich. A strong welfare state would give us the power to say Fuck You to our bosses—this is the power to say “I’m gonna work odd jobs for twenty hours a week while I work on my driftwood sculptures and play keyboards in my chillwave band. And I’ll still be able to go to the doctor and make rent.” 
Sounds like freedom to me. 

You know, I do get up every day and work.  Part of it is because I genuinely need to do so because I like what I do, but the other part is very real:  we have a family of six to support.  We made them, yep, so it is our responsibility to take care of them.

And while I do believe in individual obligations to my commnity, the idea that I should pay taxes in order to support this A-hole in working on his driftwood statues and playing keyboards is simply . . . odious.

Comments

delacrat said…
You'll will admit he's right that Libertarians want us "to hand over our Social Security account."



2.10 Retirement and Income Security

"Retirement planning is the responsibility of the individual, not the government. Libertarians would phase out the current government-sponsored Social Security system ..."

http://www.lp.org/platform
NCSDad said…
"Hand it over" to you and your inheritors.
Anonymous said…
OMG...I love sodomy. I am becoming a Libertarian!
tom said…
hey delacrat, why didn't you quote the whole sentence from the platform?

You can't very well claim the phrase you left out "...and transition to a private voluntary system." was too long, or not relevant. I guess it just didn't support you argument.

Further, if you look at the details of the various plans that have been proposed for the phase-out/transition, almost all of them involve every person who has paid the Social Security Tax getting back every dollar they have paid, with interest, and most of them allow for currently retired people and those within a few years of retirement to choose between a buyout, or continuing to receive their current SS benefit payments for the rest of their lives.
delacrat said…
Tom,

Oh, you mean we should trust our retirements to the LIEBOR riggers, liar loaners, bubble blowers and robo-signers in "the private voluntary system"; that was so recently bailed-out by the U.S. taxpayer?

No thanks. I have more faith in government drones than in white collar criminals.
tom said…
You are welcome to eat cat food and live in squalor during your retirement years because you trusted the government to provide for you.

I, on the other hand, would gladly renounce all claim to the tens of thousands of dollars I've already been forced to flush down the toilet of Socialist Security in return for freedom from any further Socialist Security taxation or "benefits" for the rest of my life.

Where do I get the opt-out form?
delacrat said…
Tom,

Those who disdain government programs like SS and Medicare are happy to avail themselves of them once reality punctures their libertarian illusions.

The libertarian saint, Ayn Rand, being a prime example.

"Doctors cost a lot more money than books earn and she could be totally wiped out" without the aid of these two government programs. Ayn took the bail out even though Ayn "despised government interference and felt that people should and could live independently... She didn't feel that an individual should take help."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-ford/ayn-rand-and-the-vip-dipe_b_792184.html
NCSDad said…
Life expectancy of African Americans just about matches SS eligibility age. So we take all their lives and give them nothing to hand to their children. That's the kind of thing you get from gov. If each of them signed on for this voluntarily it would be OK. They didn't, it's not. Oh, and $70,000,000,000 in unfunded liabilities.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...