Skip to main content

Eric Dondero: A prediction for Delaware in the event of a Romney win

Despite our rabidly different views on issues like foreign policy, I actually get along with Eric rather well (mysteries abound), and he has re-blogged a number of Delaware Libertarian posts at his own place.

So when he asked me to post this, I read it--found it to be oh so totally Eric (which means good for spurring comment)--and thought, what the hell, why not?

Usual disclaimers apply for a guest post (not necessarily the opinion of the managment, etc. etc.):


With Romney win, where does that leave tiny blue state Delaware?
 
by Eric Dondero
 
A new poll out today by Quinnipiac has Mitt Romney behind Obama by only 7 points in the deeply blue state of Connecticut.  7 points! [Note:  Eric says "Today"--he sent this piece to me nearly a week ago, but I didn't get to it.]
 
Also this morning Politico is headlining a story "Who will be in the Romney cabinet."  That's right, deeply Democrat-leaning Politico is coming very close to conceding the race.
 
Over the weekend, MSNBC's Chris Matthews lost it on Republican Chairman Reince Priebus, going on a long 3 minute rant, with his golden locks flying all over the place, his face turning beat red.  Another sure sign, the Democrats are in complete panic mode. 
 
And why not?  They're about to lose the Senate, and the Presidency, while the House is sure to stay in GOP hands, perhaps even with a larger majority than they have now. 
 
Deeply blue states like California, New York, Massachusetts, Vermont, Illinois, Maryland and tiny Delaware are going to be SOL with the new incoming Romney administration.  That's simply the way politics works. 
 
Democrat governors will get the cold shoulder from the Republican administration and congress who controls the purse strings, come January.  They may even start feeling a chill in early December. 
 
Maryland Governor Martin O'Malley has been viciously attacking Romney.  (See LibertarianRepublican.net) Last week in an interview prior to the GOP convention he practically called Romney/Ryan racists, saying they wanted to return America to a white "Ozzie and Harriet" exclusionist vision. 
 
Interestingly, neighboring Governor Democrat Jack Markel has been rather reserved in his criticisms of the Romney/Ryan ticket, this despite Markel's role on a national stage with the Democrat Governor's Assoc. 
 
Might he see the writing on the wall?  Is Markel smarter than O'Malley?  He could understand, that come January, Governors such as him, are going to have to work with a decidedly Republican administration. 
An Army Corps of Engineers project in the Delaware river?  A bridge in Dover?  Road construction near Christiana.  Federal outlays for Dover AFB.  These things matter in the real world of politics. 
 
If I had to guess, I'd say that my old Hebrew School classmate Jack Markel (Temple Beth El - Newark), has a bit more cunning than viciously partisan Martin O'Malley.
 
Delaware might be in a better shape come January, despite the fact that the state will vote overwhelmingly for Obama, than neighboring Maryland.  If only because Markel and Delaware Dems know how to play the political game a little better than the Crab-Stater politicians. 
 
Eric Dondero Rittberg is a graduate of Newark High School.  He served on the Libertarian National Committee in 1986/87 representing Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Delaware.  He was a 1986 Libertarian candidate for State House in Newark. 

Comments

anonone said…
Sad to see you're spreading the views of a vile bigot who advocates the mass slaughter of innocent people.

Eric Dondero said…
Yeah, I agree. Martin O'Malley is a total piece of shit.

May the blue crabs in nibble all over his body, and the jelly fish sting his toes, next time he goes for a swim in the Chesapeake Bay.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...