Skip to main content

Vilest and most idiotic News Journal letter of the week

(With apologies to Hube for stealing his schtick.)

First off, this letter was published yesterday (September 19)--eight days AFTER the primary it was intended to influence.  That idiocy I assign to the News Journal.

However, the letter itself is vile for reasons I will explain below:

Congratulations to Nick Manolakos for his new career path as head master of the Odyssey Charter School. As a voter I applaud his new job choice. 
What I question is his commitment and ability to be a committed legislator or a committed head master. Last session Rep. Manolakos missed over 20 percent of the votes cast in Dover. Now in his new role what will he choose to be committed to? Thestudents and the school or being in Legislative Hall for session in Dover by 2 p.m. every Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday from January to June. 
Either the students suffer or votes get missed. Seems to me that he would be receiving two state pay checks while being committed to only working two part-time state jobs. No chance I would cast my vote for that. 
Mike McBride 
Newark
First thought (for Representative Joe Miro):  next time you find somebody to place a letter in the paper slamming a candidate you should make sure that your letter writer actually lives in your district.  He doesn't. 

Then, before you start throwing low-class shit around, you should get the whole story.  Why has Nick Manolakos missed time at Leg Hall?  Because he's had a very sick daughter, you moron.

You can't name a significant vote he's missed that would have affected the outcome, because there haven't been any.

You can't name a time when Nick has allowed family or work issues to keep him from following up on constituent concerns, because there haven't been any.

Nick Manolakos has served the 21st (now 22nd) District effectively, and with honor.

I changed my registration to Republican just before the blackout period specifically to be able to vote for him in the primary.  (And given how I feel about the DE GOP this is not something I admit lightly.  Hear that, jason?  Feel free to take the shot.)

He chose to run a clean re-election campaign in a district gerrymandered to benefit Mr. Miro's chances, despite the fact that he--like a lot of us--knew exactly where Mr. Miro's ethical vulnerabilities lie.

Mr. Miro chose instead, with over 60% of the new district coming from his old one, to run a campaign that included smear and innuendo.

I have been proud of the votes that Nick Manolakos cast as my State Representative over the years.  He stood as a Republican for civil unions, for decreased penalties for non-violent drug use, for keep the budget in check, and for reasonable education accountability.

Hey, Nick!  Except for that vote against fusion candidacies last year (we forgive you), you actually sound more like a Libertarian than a Republican.

As for you, Mr. Miro, you will be known for the tactics you used, and I have hopes that--despite the fact that the GOP registration in the district favors you this November--that your tenure in this new district will be all of . . . two years.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Not to mention the perpetual politician Nanny Joe Miro is the IDIOT who pushed and pushed and pushed for years to make using a mobile phone in your car (as MILLIONS of people do quite safely every day across the country, laws or no laws) yet another pretext for dumbass Miro's soccer-mom fellating police state.

Fuck him and everyone like him.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...