Skip to main content

Watching freedom evaporate

No, this is NOT a post about gun control--it's about the constant wars on American civil liberties (with a brief nod toward China).

Here are the quick hits in our losing battle for human freedom.

1.  Congress doesn't have the time or the intestinal fortitude to avoid the fiscal cliff, but it apparently has plenty of time and feral willingness to hold nearly secret floor debates on re-authorizing FISA and unconstitutional warrantless wiretaps. [h/t kavips and NCSDad]  UPDATE:  the Senate has defeated Senator Rand Paul's amendment to equate emails with telephone calls in terms of privacy protection 79-12, as well as another amendment [based on that useless old Bill of Rights] to require the Attorney General to report periodically on certain types of surveillance decisions, 54-37.  Unsurprisingly, the ferocious defender of the state's right to know EVERYTHING is Senator Diane Feinstein--the same lawmaker who is introducing legislation to make virtually all semi-automatic pistols illegal and to require Federal registration of damn near all legally acquired weapons in the US.

2.  According to Reporters without Borders, the US has now slipped down from 35th to 47th place in terms of freedom of the press.  We are now behind such free societies as Uruguay, Niger, Botswana, and El Salvador.  But the good news is that we're still tied with Romania in terms of press freedoms!  We're number 47!  We're number 47! [h/t to Homesick Billy]

3.  A possible glimpse of our future from China (#174 on the press freedoms list--if we keep trying, we'll get there!):  the Chinese government is now moving to force all internet users to log their real names as a condition of access.  Of course, you can trust the government when it tells you that this is all about protecting you from spam.

Comments

Delaware Watch said…
Allow me to point out how well many of the Scandinavian social democracies scored in press freedoms in spite of their so–called bloated national governments.
Dana

I agree with this comment completely. I think there are different kinds of government "bloat." While I am obviously not favor of scandinavian style socialism, these countries are remarkably free from the crushing military and domestic security expenditures that lead to political repression of the press and to massive government intrusion into our private lives.

Those lessons we can certainly learn, especially from the Finns.

However, there is another complicating factor in such analysis--I think that the general ethnic homgeneity that has marked these nations until about the last ten years also has a lot to do with press freedom. I note that as the first waves of immigrants into Scandinavia from the Middle East and North Africa have arrived, the system (and the native population) are having the same problems absorbing them as the rest of Europe or the US are having, albeit at a much reduced scale.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...