Skip to main content

Download this gun--the 2nd Amendment and 3D printing

Science fiction meets public policy and the debate changes forever.

In the world of 3D printing, the ability to manufacture your own weapons becomes the same as the ability to own a computer and the right printer.

Or, to put it another way:  guns become another form of information.

A Texas "crypto-anarchist" has successfully manufactured an AR-15 lower receiver group [which is, legally, the gun] with a 3D printer and fired 660 rounds of ammunition with it [it didn't fail; he ran out of bullets].

Thousands of people have already downloaded the CAD file, and to do so is perfectly ... legal:
“There are no restrictions on an individual manufacturing a firearm for personal use,” a Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF) spokesperson told Ars. “However, if the individual is engaged in business as a firearms manufacturer, that person must obtain a manufacturing license.”
Moreover, with the cost of 3D printers now dropping below $1000 [there is already one on the market for $600], the ability to manufacture your own weapons is now a practical reality.  This AR-15 receiver costs about $150 to print [versus low-end costs of $135 for traditional weapons].

My friends who believe in stricter gun control laws will now have to accommodate themselves to a new reality:  an armed populace is not going to cease to exist, regardless of the laws passed, if people can store the ability to print their own weapons.  The ultimate worldwide implications of this technological innovation are staggering:  how do dictators maintain control if they cannot keep their people from owning weapons?

In America, of course, the debate will necessarily take a different course--or, at least it will once our leaders actually figure out what 3D printing is.

Comments

George Phillies said…
From the photographs I see, the "lower receiver" is not the part that is under highest mechanical stress, that being the the barrel and its inner end. Perhaps the photographs at which I am looking are not that good or hid the point.

I conclude that there is a while before we get to the stage of home-made quality firearms, but I may be wrong.

Yes, the receiver is legally the part that identifies the gun, but making receivers and making fireable weapons is not obviously the same.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...