Skip to main content

New Castle County Libertarian James Christina joins Don Ayotte in joining IPOD

Just for the record, from yesterday:
Guess this means that Mr. Christina, who ran in 2012 as the LPD candidate against Senator Patti Blevins, and who enjoys trolling this site, will also be soon submitting his resignation as the Secretary of the New Castle County chapter of the Libertarian Party of Delaware.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Perhaps IPOD will help him with his spelling and syntax.
April 16, 2013 at 4:05 PM
Anonymous said…
If we are the laughing stock, then:

a) how would he know?
b) nominating the likes of him for stuff is a big part of the reason.
April 16, 2013 at 10:19 PM
Anonymous said…
BIG FUCKING YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWWNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
April 19, 2013 at 12:13 AM
Anonymous said…
I couldn't care less if someone spells correctly or not be it in a blog, newspaper, book or whatever type of publication. I have never seen the big deal with someone trying to be " More Hollow Than thou" with the english language. What exactly is the reasoning behind it? Does it make one feel better about themselves to point out that, " hey man, you spelled the word, Scool,incorrect.It is SCHOOL, why don't you try it out sometime" or the infamous, "You know there is a thing called Spell check,Look into it"

So What ????

Sure I do not always spell correctly. Sure once in a while I use"Your " instead of "you're"..BIG WOO. And so what if I do not always state a sentence correctly. So what that I might end it in a preposition. BIG WOO.

What is the passion behind it? Is there some hidden desire to ALWAYS be correct in EVERYTHING? I am only Blogging about this subject becuase I have seen several blogs not only in OS,as of late, but other blogs as well with the Spell check Nazis in full force. Is there some kind of application that one must fill out before you one starts criticizing others?

To those who wish to degrade or punish those through your type with your politically typing correct'ness, Have fun Wiff All Dat'. Oh and Hail to you too...
April 20, 2013 at 8:01 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...
44 comments
Read more

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...
70 comments
Read more

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...
31 comments
Read more