Skip to main content

One-third of Americans support the imposition of Sharia law in the US ...

At least that's how I read the poll results that say about one-third of our population favors establishing Christianity as a state religion despite, you know, that First Amendment thing.

Actually, what troubles me about Americans these days is their "salad bar" approach to the US Constitution, wherein everyone is quite willing to take only the parts of the Constitution and Bill of Rights that they like, and to hell with the rest.

Comments

delacrat said…
Atheism "is growing faster than any religious faith in the U.S"

http://theweek.com/article/index/226625/the-rise-of-atheism-in-america
kavips said…
Isn't it time we stop listening to these polls...

Few of us have time to look at details.

for all we know, the question could have been phrased... If having a Christian government meant the continuation of the United States as a nation, would you be in favor?


Headline reads... one third favor Shara Law...

Second thought. Does any no partisan group really sample non partisan people just out of curiosity over how people would feel about having religion and government combined?

Or, is it done by someone on one side of the issue or the other, who wants to use the results for their own personal gain?

Most polls are done for someones personal gain.

Time to stop taking them seriously...
Hube said…
despite, you know, that First Amendment thing.

More precisely, it'd be that 14th Amendment thing. ;-)
tom said…
Even more precisely, it'd be that Article IV section 4 thing, and that Article VI clause 3 thing, plus the various Amendments, starting w/ the 1st.
Hube said…
Even more precisely, it'd be that Article IV section 4 thing, and that Article VI clause 3 thing, plus the various Amendments, starting w/ the 1st.

tom: Except that, until the 14th Amendment, many states had official state churches. They didn't disappear b/c of judicial mandate; they folded mainly b/c they were anachronisms.

And then after the Civil War, the 14th Amendment "incorporated" the Bill of Rights as applying to the states.
Anonymous said…
Hey tom how's that egg on your face feel?
click here said…
I would like to appreciate your work and would like to tell to my friends.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...