The key to success is getting your press releases published as news

At least that's what I learned today about the WNJ coverage of Delaware's award from the "Education Commission of the States."

Item one: there is not a single piece of information in the News Journal story that is not a direct quote or a close paraphrase of the ECS press release. Even Governor Jack Markell's comments are taken from that press release. The height of journalistic laziness is in not going to a single individual--pro or con--for an independent comment on the award or the organization.

Item two: there were things to find.

According to the press release, here's what ECS is:

The commission is a nonpartisan group of governors, legislators, school officials and other education leaders from 49 states

For example, it might have been worth knowing something about ECS, like who are the Education Commissioners for Delaware are:

Yep, that's pretty much all you need to know there.

But just in case you are still curious, let's examine who one of the GOLD sponsors of ECS is:

Nah, no possible vested interest there, huh?

Now there's not necessarily anything wrong with these associations, but if you are a reporter (hello, Matthew Albright) actually aspiring to write news stories rather than reprint the press releases of special interest groups, you'd think you'd have found this sort of thing, wouldn't you?

For the record: I know the days of reporters are so filled with Jimmy Olsen type moments that heavy research might be difficult.

This took, ah, three and one-half minutes.

Comments

Anonymous said…

Or shorter version.

The News Journal. Infommercial by the Infidel.

June 18, 2013 at 10:59 PM

Amos said…

This is cool!

August 2, 2013 at 1:50 AM

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here: chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.” The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point: Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo: Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1. Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...

Search This Blog