Skip to main content

What to remember in 2014: That budgets are choices

The latest from the News Journal on education layoffs has become business as usual in Delaware:

Brandywine is one of many school districts throughout Delaware planning layoffs. In this case, officials are expected to lay off 18 paraprofessionals and eight classroom teachers. 
In the Colonial School District, officials say they’ll be forced to lay off 81 people, including 59 classroom teachers, if voters don’t approve a tax referendum today. And even with approval of the referendum, teachers and other staffers will lose their jobs. 
In the Milford School District, 15 paraprofessionals got pink slips. 
School leaders across those districts say the problem comes from state and federal support drying up, increasing the burden on local districts.
Here's the thing:  this didn't just happen.

Budgets are choices.

The Markell administration and the members of our General Assembly made choices that led to this happening.  They continue to make them every day.

Imagine that the $26 million devoted to the chimera of the Fisker Karma had been invested instead in Delaware schools or Medicaid for poor Delaware children.

Imagine the same about the $29 million from the "Strategic Fund" sent out instead as corporate welfare to multi-billion-dollar corporations by Al Levin.

Imagine that the $5 million of RTTT compliance computers or the $2 million for a new charter school slush fund had been spent on education funding.

Imagine that the Secretary of Safety and Homeland Security's budget had not been bloated by an additional $5 million over the past three years.

Ironically, that's $65 million--$65,000,000!--that could actually have been available--without a single tax increase!--to actually pay for core services.

Like having enough teachers in the classroom.

Like having health insurance for poor kids.

When the News Journal or the DSEA Executive Board tries to feed you a line of crap about how times are tight and we all have to make sacrifices (with over 3,000 state workers so poorly paid that they qualify for Food Stamps), remind them that they didn't make sacrifices, they made choices.

We have choices, too.

And we need to make them next year by using the ballot box.

Comments

Hube said…
In a word: "Bingo."
Anonymous said…
And let's not forget that yearly leased 2.2 million helicopter sitting there STILL.
Anonymous said…
Very well stated.
Wow. Awesome work here!

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...