Skip to main content

The "Promoting Charter-District Collaboration Task Force": a lesson in Delaware politics

So we are now filling the newest education task force, and I am pleased to see Representative Paul Baumbach on the committee (although one wonders if he counter-balances Senator Dave Sokola).

But the task force itself gives me the opportunity to address the fact that in Delaware you have to have an organization to get ahead:
Let's first notice that you cannot apply directly to be on this task force.  You must be appointed by an "authority"--that is, a specific special interest group recognized by the Delaware government.

Most of these organizations have extensive and known agendas, and can be counted upon to use their opportunities to appoint to add the usual suspects and avoid anyone with really divergent ideas.

For example:  don't look for DSEA to appoint Mike Matthews, for the Chief School Officers Association to appoint Dr. Freeman Williams, or for the Delaware School Boards Association to appoint Harrie Ellen Minnehan.

Also, don't look for any parents on the task force (where, one wonders, is the DE PTA?), or any students, or even any representatives from higher education.

Here's why it is often very difficult to get anything important done in Delaware:  we love stakeholders.

Set up a meeting, and somebody will remind you that "we need to get all the stakeholders involved."

And, inevitably, the only stakeholders who matter will be the representatives of special interest organizations.

Here's where most of the critics of "education reform" go wrong:  we haven't organized the Delaware School/Community Partnership, the Delaware Association of Parents with Low SES students, the Delaware Alliance for Alternative Assessment, or even the Delaware Marching and Chowder Society for the Educationally Skeptical.

(And unfortunately, blogs don't count.)


Comments

Anonymous said…
I'm offended.

That you are right.
Nancy Willing said…
GAH - can't you provide a link to where a person can find this information?

I know that Kim Williams is Co-Chair because she told me. I don't see Paul Baumbach on the table you provided. Are you finding the information somewhere online and if so, please share. :-)
Representative Paul Baumbach said…
all task forces can be found at http://www.legis.delaware.gov/LIS/TaskForces.nsf/whTaskForcesweb?openview
when you select the Promoting Charter-District Collaboration link, there is a tab on Appointee Information, where I am listed with my three legislator colleagues.
Nancy Willing said…
Thanks Paul!

Looking online, the Nov. meeting and Jan. meetings were cancelled. I will be looking for the next scheduled meeting of this group.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...