Skip to main content

How would legal marijuana affect the Delaware budget picture?

Recall first that we were already facing a $13 million shortfall, and that the Feds just stiffed Delaware for an additional $25 million in Medicaid funds.

Now take a look at Colorado, which projects $578.1 million in legal marijuana sales next year, with a combined wholesale and retail tax revenue of $67 million (10% tax on wholesale transaction; 15% on retail).

Colorado has about five times the population of Delaware, so let's suggest $115.6 million in sales here, which would amount to $13.4 million.

So while legal pot wouldn't wipe out the Medicaid problem, it sure would eliminate the current budget deficit that DEFAC is predicting.

Moreover, you have to remember that there would be secondary gains, budget-wise, in legal marijuana:  decreased prison costs and--very probably--decreased violence on Wilmington's streets.

So who in our General Assembly will have the courage to step up in January with a bill?

. . . crickets . . .

Comments

Anonymous said…
The budget gap is $150 million, with that $60 million from an overpaid corporate tax bill still pending.

http://www.wdde.org/54284-delaware-revenue-estimate
January 2, 2014 at 3:17 PM
NCSDad said…
CO limits sales to non-residents. If you really wanted to crank up the tax machine we could have open sales. The benefits of legalization are staggering. Only difference is in who supplies since it is here already. Criminals, supporting police or businesses supporting welfare programs.
January 3, 2014 at 7:32 AM
Hank Foresman said…
Actually Colorado is no regulating who buys it is just not legal to take out of the state.

I say this tongue in cheek, you could put a tax on pot, and a special tax on Doritos. Stoners delight.
January 3, 2014 at 8:56 PM
NCSDad said…
Per USA Today: This depends on whether or not you're a Colorado resident.

If you are, then you can buy up to an ounce per visit for recreational use -- the limit is two ounces for holders of a medical marijuana card. If you aren't, then you're limited to a quarter of an ounce per visit.
January 3, 2014 at 10:40 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...
44 comments
Read more

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...
70 comments
Read more

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...
31 comments
Read more