Skip to main content

Students need to be nurtured; teachers need resources; DE and US DOE need to get the hell out of the way

Here are two recent first-person articles regarding the welcome backlash against the pervading high-stakes testing mentality being used to corporatize teachers in America.

Both are worth your time.

I would love to teach, but . . .

How to truly evaluate a teacher

The driving idea behind American public education used to be that teachers were responsible for nurturing children to help them develop into competent, independent learners as adults who would become good citizens.

The driving idea behind American public education today seems to be that teachers are surrogate corporate trainers for entry-level jobs and to meet college entrance expectations.

Which is truly interesting because . . .

The entire workforce and structure of post-industrial America is changing rapidly, and it is not the corporate dinosaurs like those supporting Vision [enter appropriate year here] who are leading the way. The future is one of crypto-currencies, dispersed work forces, 3-D printing, and lots of neat stuff that our children all inherently understand better than overpaid men in charcoal suits.

The whole traditional experience of higher education is changing rapidly, and within 20 years I'd bet that without a massive government takeover more than half of the colleges and universities in the US that now exist will be out of business.  My children and yours in high school are among the last generation that will continue to pay outrageous prices for an education that the marketplace will soon bring them almost for free.

Corporate educrats are, in the military vernacular, still fighting the last war.

And they are fighting it here in Delaware on the backs of Delaware teachers and students.

It's past time to think about providing Delaware teachers resources instead of new tests and evaluations.

For $119 million we could have bought every single student in Delaware a good laptop, or, we could actually have invested $5 million each into Delaware's 22 schools with the highest percentage of poor, non-English speaking, or special needs students, and then sat back to see what happened.

The biggest impediment to doing something like that?  The US and DE Departments of Education--and a General Assembly crammed with politicians who gleefully take campaign donations from DSEA on the one hand and Rodel on the other, then allow millions of education to go other places than into classrooms.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...