Skip to main content

More from Strange Maps: the liberating power of Stalinist Marxism

Ever since A Secondhand Conjecture turned me on to Strange Maps, I have been plumbing their archives, and have found some incredible stuff. (Hube, you've really got to go there and take a look, man.)

Below is a night satellite shot of North and South Korea. The South, of course, is home to a despicable capitalist engine producing Hyundai automobiles and all sorts of other things that give rise to a country with severe income disparities and lots of social turbulence.

North Korea is one of the few remaining true Stalinist paradises on Earth (even the Chinese have been corrupted), where men are men (but have bad hair cuts), the peasants are self-reliant (and eat the bark off the trees), and the women are nearly 11 centimeters shorter (that's a little over four inches for those of you holding out for the English system) than their counterparts in the capitalist South. (Be sure not just to look at the map, but visit the original post at Strange Maps and read the whole article.)

By the way, the big blob in northwest South Korea is Seoul (23 million budding entrepreneurs); the only dot in North Korea is Pyongyang, with a population of 3 million. I remember Dan Rather commenting about ten years ago that when he went to Pyongyang to cover the nuclear issue, his tour guide told him that he must be a bigwig because his hotel suite had a light bulb in every room.

Comments

Anonymous said…
So when are we forcing them to switch to Compact Florescents?

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...