Skip to main content

Father/daughter blogging the Markell-Carney Education Debate

(My twelve-year-old daughter's observations will be in bold. They are probably much better than mine, anyway.)

The setting: every education bureaucrat and party hack on the make all in one place. Damn few "just voters." Mike Protack standing in the third row, facing the crowd and trying to find someone to chat with.

The short version: Markell and Carney agree on the following: the DSTP should be scrapped; no funding parity for charters (but at least Dave Burris got his question in); Gifted/Talented education is a must; good teachers are a must; we love minorities and the disadvantaged; got to spend a lot more money on education; can't scrap property taxes; there are a lot of teachers in my family, and I learned to name-drop at a very early age....

My daughter liked Markell: sez the same thing as the other guy but at least he keeps me awake.

She's not so hot on Carney: he's kinda robotic and (kinda mean) but also a sissy.

Hey, I don't write her material.

On schools that "feel like family" (a Markell quote): maybe in Canada, but at [school name deleted] we detest our teachers.

On where they're going to find the money to pay for all this: they are going to steal it from New Jersey.

On year round schools: take away my summer? You aren't planning to vote for them, are you?

You could sum up this debate in one phrase: pandering to the education establishment (and, yes, Dave, to the DSEA as well).

You know who was never mentioned, either by the questioners or the candidates? Delaware's special needs students. I guess they don't figure too prominently into the plans of our would-be governors.

I came away from this debate with a profound feeling that public education in this State, despite all of Markell's talk about "bold leadership" and Carney's insistence on "learning at the desk," has become another soulless corporate product we're being sold by our ever-expanding government. All of our problems will be solved if we consolidate bus transportation and district purchasing to provide the money for every whatsis wish list our current educational leaders want to purchase.

My daughter's comment: when can we leave? all they do is promise everything to everybody and you know they won't do it.

It is probably obvious now that the wrong member of my family is in charge of this blog.

Comments

Anonymous said…
You could sum up this debate in one phrase: pandering to the education establishment (and, yes, Dave, to the DSEA as well).

*

This is what I have been taking away from their platforms. The land use positions are pure verbiage too. Very disappointing.

Steve and daughter, such a gas!
Delaware Watch said…
What a delightful post. It was awfully cute.

I love these:

"On where they're going to find the money to pay for all this: they are going to steal it from New Jersey."

That might be a good idea if we could get away w/ it.

"On year round schools: take away my summer? You aren't planning to vote for them, are you?

Now there is a young lady w/ the right priorities in place. She's correct in my view. Children need those summers.

Thanks for sharing those Steve. They have me smiling ear to ear. :)
I think your daughter is the smartest blogger in Delaware.

I wish our politicians would talk this way...that is, straight !

Kudos to you and your daughter...you make a good team.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...