Skip to main content

A Short Diatribe Against All This Race Politics

Steve wrote an interesting look at why someone like Pat Buchanan should not be painted with a broad condemnation brush and written-off solely based on his comments related to race.

Buchanan gave a very interesting analysis
* of the war issue and the larger ideological context in which it resides :


[* - Jeanne Kirkpatrick was a professor of mine at Georgetown University. From 1994-95 I studied in her courses 'Critique of Utopia' and 'Capitalism, Competition, and Democracy'.]

I agree with everything Buchanan says in the video but do I agree with everything Buchanan says anywhere else I have heard him?

Certainly not but it worries me not an iota
because, as Steve mentioned, he is not elected and has no public power to wield over any of us.

Nevertheless, as the above video attests, Buchanan has had valid and insightful ideas and analyses for many big questions, not the least of which was a very realpolitik critique of the Iraq war. Even more, his critique was based not on short-term, transient politics but on the larger picture of what our post-Cold War foreign policy should have been in the long-term.

But putting aside the question of whether Pat Buchanan has anything worthwhile to offer or should be savaged and exiled for remarks some perceive as racially-insensitive, I think there is a larger issue embedded in Steve's commentary.

It is that race, race-baiting, racism, and the whole (for some) zero-sum gamut of nastiness and accusation stemming from it are eclipsing substantive discussion of the relevant and pressing issues facing our country.


Clearly many from the loudmouth left and the self-righteous right want to pick the race scab over and over, playing on fear and loathing, dredging up victimology politics, pointing out new "racist" boogeymen behind every word or remark, or otherwise making muddy hay of an emotional and deep-seated part of American history and its residuum.

With no apologies to those who can see all the world big and small through the narrow lens of race, a distorted view I don't understand or abide, there are challenges like poverty, economic decline, runaway government, and war, to name a few, that are far more real and universal challenges facing us all than race politics.

We must get on with what matters to everyone rather than indulge the blathering whims of a splinter of the American public
that would use racially-charged inflammatory rhetoric on the pretext of "reverse" racism or for just plain political points.

Likewise the splinter that
can't get over the fact that they have never had any real experiences with real racism much less the historic quest for equal civil rights, so they become self-appointed 21st century race police.

===============================================

What I say to the race-baiters, especially those who are not themselves minorities, is : get over yourselves. No one died and made you God. You've walked in no one's shoes but your own. Your rhetoric is corrosive and destructive, without real foundation in practical reality. Please stop
exploiting race politics for your ulterior agendas, whatever they be, and grow up.

It is not what our country or our discourse need or want in this time of many challenges, when we should be trying to come together, however and wherever possible, in common cause...rather than setting out to demonize others, on either side of the question, with reckless and ridiculous abandon.

Those of us who want public discussions and actions that are constructive towards solutions may have to hear the screamers who would make race the omnipresent issue trumping all...but we don't have to listen.

No need to write them off.

No need to demonize them.

But no need to let them de-rail progress, nor basic civility.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...

Soda tax debate reveals fundamental progressive assertions about your lack of individual rights and the "responsiblities" of the State

I thought it would be at least amusing to use the Delawareliberal comments as sub-headings regarding each category of what is wrong with the proposed tax on sodas and juice drinks. But there are so many different little strands of each comment that it would be impossible to pull them all out. So, instead, I'm going to let you read them in more or less the order they appeared, and note the assumptions. pandora: I’m perfectly okay with taxing sodas and juice drinks. Mainly because they’re total crap, and one of the main reasons our country’s children are overweight. They are also dirt cheap. Assumptions here: (1) Because "I" am perfectly okay with a new tax it should be imposed on everybody; (2) it is the government's responsibility to keep children from being obese; (3) the cheapness of the product to be taxed justifies charging people more for it. John Manifold: Soda fattens your kids [and you and your husband], shortens their lives, costs more than water [a...