Skip to main content

Food Fight?

I don't think our grandparents had this problem--although they may have had it without knowing it.

I am referring to the dramatic expansion of special dietary needs in today's world, and I'll use my family as an example of just how much fun it is to purchase and prepare (let alone budget for) food and meals that my entire family can eat.

There are six of us.

My wife and youngest daughter (the twelve-year-old sometime blogger) are both rebound hypoglycemics. They cannot have significant amounts of sugar in anything they eat (unless carefully matched against countervailing fat content). All baking recipes that require large amounts of sugar have to be modified with items like concentrated fruit juice (because neither of them can tolerate most chemical sugar substitutes like aspartame, either). My daughter needs to consume a significant amount of milk every day.

They are the simplest people to feed.

My older daughter is lactose intolerant and has problems digesting meat that are cooked to less than shoe-leather consistency.

My son has adolescent chronic fatigue syndrome, which is apparently related to his hyperallergy to milk products. This is not lactose intolerance. He cannot consume any product made with lactose, whey or casein. (The result is often wracking stomach cramps that last for hours.) He is also allergic to bananas.

My grandson (five years old) cannot consume much sugar or artificial sweeteners at all. At first we thought they simply made him hyper. Now we suspect (and are having him tested for) borderline juvenile diabetes, with all the dietary implications that entails. He is so sensitive to sugar content that he drinks soy milk instead of cow's milk (but he can eat nonfat yogurt and cheese.

I have a propensity for growing kidney stones. I have been forced to swear off iced tea (and I am a Southron--argh), peanuts, peanut butter, most other nuts; spinach and broccoli (no big loss there); and almost all berries (as well as limiting consumption of tomatoes).

Making a dinner that everybody can eat becomes an increasingly dicey proposition (and my problem as chief cook).

I used to think it was just us. But our neighbor's family of five includes two (father and eldest daughter) with Celiac's [cannot touch even microscopic amounts of wheat gluten) and another who can't tolerate wheat or milk.

There is, of course, a peanut-free table at school, and loads of special diets to be accommodated.

I pay a good amount of money, by the way, to have beef and chicken certified hormone and anti-biotic free delivered to my house on a regular basis because the literature on that is downright scarey.

I wonder where all this comes from. Did these needs always exist, but we just didn't know about them?

Or have we somehow created this brave new world of dietary complexity?

Comments

Brian said…
Steve,

My relatives in agronomy and biology and farming all feel that this is a result of genetically modified foods, the use of mercury compounds in pesticides and the use of metal compounds in processed flour. They feel that this will all become more and more common as foods are further manipulated.

I still eat whatever the hell I want. But I am like an opossum- eating raw crab and papaya salad with hot peppers, or abalone like an otter. Perhaps a new species: Homo S. Medditeranous superOmnivorous.

You can go here for a brief overview... http://www.gmofoodforthought.com/2005/11/

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...