Once again I can only stand in awe . . .

. . . of Becky's (the Girl in Short Shorts) ability to turn in not only the best line of the day but a an astounding--fact-based--analysis of why you may not want to feel quite so sorry for Elliot Spitzer's wife.

But first, the line:

Hillary, of course, always knew Bill was incapable of keeping his pants on. But I suspect Silda had her suspicions. The girl ain't dumb. And at least her hubby wasn't getting his rocks off on chubby interns.

The power of misplaced cum may propel Hillary Clinton into the White House.

It will take Silda Wall to anywhere she wants to go.

The entire post is entitled Silda Spitzer and the Power of Misplaced Cum.

You quite simply won't believe it.

Comments

Anonymous said…

"The girl ain't dumb. And at least her hubby wasn't getting his rocks off on chubby interns."

This aside from comments about metrosexuals may be the very best commentary I have ever seen on a "sexual debacle." I would prefer it if we were just mature enough to accept that powerful people want to get their rocks off as much as anyone else. Problem is one should not break the law to do so. I would have preferred to see an expose and comparison to Love Ranch.- Brian

March 13, 2008 at 3:07 PM

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here: chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.” The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point: Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo: Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1. Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...

Search This Blog