Skip to main content

Thomas Jefferson: Sex Scandal




This morning I was thinking, Steve and my last discussions about the former governor of New York and his wife were only appropriate in the context of hack editorial journalism. Other stars have risen and been discredited with sex scandals. And I was humbled by the fact that the man whose ideals, more than any other, shaped our nation and my thought was also rocked by a sex scandal with hack Journalists attacking him viciously and from every angle.


When Adams was making ruthless fun of Jefferson for all of his peccadilloes and idiosyncrasies, he was doing much the same as hacks do today. I am no exception. I am a hack sometimes too. My weird sense of humor and healthy mischief cause that.

Adams would smash Jeffersonian foreign policy, smash his idealism at every turn with a realistic candor that was often much more cruel and they would use hack journalists to hack each other in surrogate.


Jefferson's sex scandal started on a cold day. He was inside of Monticello and the frost outside was too much. The fire inside was heating up. And after the death of his wife, Jefferson did the unthinkable for an 18th century gentleman and fell in love with his slave. This of course has been hotly contested, but from his own idiosyncratic life, his view of equality, his own personal contradictions it is nothing surprising.



The real shock to me is that a country that could not accept Africans as people, let alone as Americans, let Jefferson continue to shape policy and retain all he had worked for. It is amazing they did not try to exile him from the country, only to his own and beloved Monticello. They were not nearly as vindictive toward the man then as we have been to Spitzer, who may have charges filed against him. Granted no one can say Jefferson used the public dole for his private affairs, but his private affairs were as open to scrutiny as much then as all of ours are now.


As this article shows, you have to get a free subscription to read it, Jefferson's love affairs were the talk of the town. http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-3824740.html


And from MSNBC, those exemplars of journalistic honesty and non-bloviating discourse:


Sally Hemings, Jefferson’s slave, gave birth to a son, Easton Hemings, who was listed "white" in the 1830 Census.

Editorial printed in the Boston Gazette:

Thou Sally, thou my house shall keep,

My widower’s tears shall dry!

My virgin daughters — see!

They weep -Their mother’s place supply.

Oh Sally hearken to my vows!

Yield up thy sooty charms —My best beloved!

My more than spouse,Oh! Take me to thy arms.

If we really want to be honest, we have to understand that complex and powerful men and women often do things for their own longing and out of their own desire to love and be loved that we may not understand or approve of. As long as they do not use public funds to do so, I say fine! Grab life with both hands!

There are many faces to any complex, creative, intelligent man or woman and Jefferson was no exception: http://www.loc.gov/loc/lcib/0004/jefferson.html

If we want to produce anything great in the future we need contradicted people who think deeply about life and love. Idealistic people who can think like Jefferson about life. Without them our idealism and the meaning of those ideals dries up at the root.

One can only hope the former governor was thinking this way and was not being a shallow egocentric jerk. And while the latter is probably true, the temptations of power and desire that we all share, whether we are honest enough with ourselves to admit it or not, make it difficult for any man not to indulge in sensuality of some kind. I personally prefer a much more humble kind of sin: like good coffee and pinot noir, maybe a pineapple and chocolate, art and science. To love deeply is no crime. But to use public funds on hookers is a crime.

If privately someone else prefers hookers and cheesecake, who am I to write stinging satire, to judge them? It is the victimless crimes that should be forgiven, but if you plan to enter public life, make sure you use public funds and the public trust wisely. You do not need to be perfect to be good, but please try to be good and develop a depth of life and love that will keep your vision clear for the job you need to do.

If you encounter critics because you are not perfect, tell them one word: Tolerance. And you will find they are not perfect either.

Comments

Anonymous said…
This helped a lot.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...