Skip to main content

The Atlanta Journal Constitution gets it right: Libertarian Allen Buckley included in weekly question

The AJC has a weekly question for Georgia Senatorial candidates, each of whom receives 150 words to reply.

This week's question: "What should the United States do to end the war in Iraq?"

The AJC--unlike far too much of the mainstream media--has correctly chosen to include Libertarian Senate candidate Allen Buckley in the mix.

Buckley, you may recall, is the Libertarian against whom Bob Barr has provide GOPer Saxby Chambliss thousands of dollars in campaign contributions, but who also polled over $75,000 votes in the lieutenant governor's race two years ago.

It makes a refreshing contrast to compare Buckley's answer to that of Chambliss:

Saxby Chambliss: I have visited our troops in Iraq six times, and I see continued progress toward the establishment of Iraqi security, stability and self-governance. Attacks against coalition forces and civilians are steadily declining. Iraqi forces are becoming more effective. Progress is being made, and our efforts to build a democratic, safe and free Iraq are bearing fruit. Security improvements are leading to political progress, reconciliation, and cooperation.

Responsible observers of the situation in Iraq agree that a precipitous U.S. withdrawal would create a power vacuum leading to total chaos resulting in perhaps the largest and most dangerous situation in the world. Any attempt to micromanage the war by Congress weakens our efforts and emboldens our enemies. This is an unacceptable outcome.

The reality is that we remain at war with cowardly extremists, and we must remain committed to defeating their ideology of hatred. We end the war in Iraq by winning....

Allen Buckley : I believe we should give the Iraqis a choice, to be decided within three months via any mechanism the Iraqis choose (e.g., national referendum), between two options: (a) we'll spend two years helping them divide Iraq into as many countries as they desire; or (b) we'll depart within one year. If the Iraqis do not provide an answer within the three-month period, we depart within one year. If they choose division into two or more countries, we help them the best we can within reason for two years, but we leave after the two-year period expires, regardless of the amount of progress made to date. Iraqi oil (including future oil revenue, if necessary) would fund our costs incurred during the period we remain.


It is also important to note that, in Georgia, the Libertarian candidate has not been excluded from debates, as has been the case of North Carolina gubernatorial candidate Dr Michael Munger.

Indeed, the AJC's June 9 coverage of a six-candidate free-for-all gave equal coverage to Allen Buckley, citing him several times:

Libertarian candidate Allen Buckley called for smaller government and a get-tough attitude on the federal deficit....

The Democrats all called for some form of expanded or universal health care, drawing a sharp retort from Libertarian Buckley, who said universal care sounds good but is fundamentally flawed and would require a "50 percent" tax hike to fund.

The candidates advanced an array of suggestions to confront the current oil crisis.

Buckley called for the expanded use of fledgling hydrogen technology. Knight suggested the use of agricultural waste to produce fuel. Jones called for tougher auto standards and "energy diversity."


Given the fragmented state of the Democratic ticket in Georgia, if Bob Barr gets off his rump and actively supports a fellow Libertarian for a change, Buckley could break 100,000 votes this time.

By the way, in case you were wondering, Bob Barr is now polling at 6% in Georgia. McCain has 44%, Obama 43%, and Undecided 7%. What is really, really intriguing is that Barr's support is not all coming from GOPers. He is pulling 7.5% of Republicans, but also 5% of Democrats.

Comments

Brian Shields said…
I like Buckley's response. It's just what they need over there, pressure to get their political act together, and undeniable, unbluffable consequences.

I think I'll adopt it as my new, more realistic position on the war.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...