Skip to main content

Jason Gatties proves that he is a class act


Jason Gatties, Libertarian candidate for the Lake Michigan College Board of Trustees, has asked that this weekend, in lieu of donations to his campaign, people please send their money to cyclone victims in Myanmar (or, for old farts like me, Burma). [h/t to Last Free Voice]

Funny, I can't imagine Barack Obama, John McCain, Bob Barr, Ralph Nader, or Ron Paul doing the same thing.

Oh, wait, I don't have to imagine it: they didn't do it, or anything remotely like it.

Unfortunately, some Libertarians could not resist using Jason's principled call to indulge in their own partisan fund-raising activities.

So Jason, I'm going to both listen to you and ignore you. I promise you I'll send at least fifty bucks to the relief campaign, but I'm still sending you the ten bucks I promised.

We're Americans. We can do more than one right thing at a time.

Think about what might have happened if all the presidential candidates had gotten together and announced that for one day they were turning over all their donation receipts to Myanmar relief.

That might be change I could believe in.

I'm not holding my breath.

Thanks, Jason, for setting a standard.
Labels:

Comments

Waldo Lydecker's Journal said…
How would one distinguish between one and another of several natural disasters going on in the world at any given time? Are the victims in Burma more deserving than those in Darfur? Are either more cases more deserving than flood victims in the American midwest, or, say, New Orleans, which has ceased to be interesting to the media or the government?

Such things as Mr. Gatties' gesture are thoughtful, and reflect well on the man, but they are still gestures.If gestures are praiseworthy, ought not Obama get some praise for canceling campaign events in Iowa and showing up to help fill sandbags? Senator McCain, by contrast, showed up and looked at flooding, then went off to raise money somewhere.

But if it's purely a matter of being a candidate and not spending the money one raises on winning, well, good on ya, Mr. Gatties.
June 28, 2008 at 5:33 PM
Steven H. Newton said…
Do you really believe that Barack Obama and his campaign staff weren't aware of the public relations impact of the Iowa event. By one account I read (although I can't find it at the moment to give you the link) they spent $35,000 on local ad buys to publicize their candidate's forty-five minutes of filling sandbags.
June 28, 2008 at 5:44 PM
Tyler Nixon said…
The gesture is certainly worthy, but as a zero sum proposition I would rather see my money fund a libertarian candidate anywhere in the U.S., than be a drop in the ocean of assistance going to a disaster recovery halfway around the globe.

I am pretty confident substantial U.S. tax dollars/resources have already flowed to Myanmar's recovery, have they not?
June 28, 2008 at 7:45 PM
Anonymous said…
The point was, to bring attention to something I feel strongly about. Simple as that. I have the rest of the campaign season to raise money for my efforts. And my proposal has worked, as MANY people have emailed me today stating that they will in fact donate.

I feel for the people of Iowa, New Orleans, Zimbabwe & anyone else who is suffering. This was simply something that I personally wanted to bring to light and hoped some of my fellow libertarian activists would get involved.

If you would rather donate to the flood victims in Iowa...do it. I encourage that as well. If you want to donate to a good Libertarian candidate this weekend...do it. This is just something I personally believe in and something I will continue to support.
June 28, 2008 at 8:26 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...
44 comments
Read more

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...
70 comments
Read more

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...
31 comments
Read more