Skip to main content

Bob Barr and those annoying down-ticket Libertarians

This in from Chris Cole, Libertarian candidate for US Senate in North Carolina [who is currently polling 4-6% against Liddy Dole and Kay Hagan]:

Hi, Steve,

I was reading your comments about the party HQ forgetting about the rest of the LP ticket, and thought that you would be interested in my experience with Barr on this matter.

He was a guest on my hometown talk radio station, with a host who is actually sympthetic with a great deal of libertarianism. He introduced Barr as a "true conservative", a title that Barr did not object to. Then during his interview, Barr said that Republicans should support him because he would bring out voters who would support the rest of the candidates on the Republican ticket. No mention of the LP or of other candidates on the LP ticket.

The station was WBT in Charlotte, and the host was Keith Larson. Barr was also on their morning news, on which he was introduced as a "traditional Republican." Again, he gave no correction.

I wrote an email to the campaign, mentioning how damaging that exchange was to other LP candidates, candidates on whose support Barr depends.

I got no response.


[Used with Chris Cole's expression permission.]

And, here, if you're skeptical, is where you can find the 30-second clip of Barr's analysis of how his candidacy helps down-ticket GOPers.

Thanks, Bob. For nothing.

Well, maybe not nothing. This sort of proves my point that neither Bob Barr nor the LP apparently gives a rip about all those hundreds of Libertarians running in State and local elections.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Interesting, not a surprise, but I would think it would help if this article had a date on it - was this before or after Barr conned the LP nomination out of the Denver sucker club?

I know he was talking about helping down-ticket R's before getting the nomination, is he still doing it as the candidate?

ART
LP Presidential Elector, NOT voting for Barr!
The interview occurred on 13 May 2008.
George Donnelly said…
Reaching out is good. Reaching out so far that you kick your own in the nuts is bad.

One more reason to continue my moratorium on donations to Bob Barr.
Eric Dondero said…
We Libertarian petitioners are out in the field every single day trying to qualify Barr/Root for the ballot.

One of the BIG excuses we get from voters for not wanting to sign is that him being on the ballot will "steal votes from the Republicans."

A reasonable answer to this objection is that Barr could bring out voters who would otherwise not have voted at all, and in all likelyhood, although they won't vote for McCain, they could vote for downticket Republican candidates.

Take New Hampshire for instance. You have a Leftwinger Liberal, posing as a Libertarian, some guy named Ken Blevins, running against a hardcore Libertarian Republican like John Sununu. Sen. Sununu has won the RLC Index as the "most libertarian member of the US Senate" three times in a row.

Is it not reasonable to assume that some disgruntled conservatives, who might have otherwise stayed at home, would come out to cast a protest vote for Barr, and while there, also vote for Sununu against horrible Leftist Dem Jeane Shaheen?

And if so, what in the hell is wrong with using such an argument on radio to allay any Republican fears?

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...