Skip to main content

A Delaware Libertarian Exclusive: Interview with NC Libertarian Senatorial candidate Chris Cole


This is the platform statement of Libertarian US Senate candidate Chris Cole:

Unlike my opponents, I have never been for the war, until I was against it. I have always been against it. Democrats and Republicans always promise to "keep taxes low", while I understand that they are already outrageously high. I will never promise you gifts from other people's money, while silently taking your money to give to others. I will give you an opportunity to vote for the liberty we all cherish instead of voting against one evil or the another.


Cole is now scoring 4-6% in polling against the well-funded campaigns of Liddy Dole and Kay Hagan.

Recently, I had the opportunity to pose five questions to Cole, and these are his responses:

1. Libertarian candidates have been polling pretty well in NC this year. What one or two specific items from a Libertarian agenda do you think is resonating with voters strongly enough to make them > consider abandoning both the Republicans and Democrats?

Chris Cole: My suspicion is that they have caught on to the danger of voting for the lesser of two evils. In the past, someone was constantly telling me that he had to vote for A, because B would be so much worse. While I still get some of that, I think more people are recognizing that voting for the lesser evil has only gotten them evil. As Dr. Phil says, "So how's that working out for yuh?" And more people are seeing that they have been wasting their votes all along. Not so much that our message has suddenly turned attractive, but rather that voting the same way has only gotten them the same thing. Now they are open to considering something else. And in NC, the Libertarians are the only alternative.


2. The general wisdom is that Libertarian candidates hurt Republicans more than Democrats, yet your polling numbers consistently suggest you're actually drawing more Democratic support. Why do you think this is?

Chris Cole: Well, I'm openly gay, so the Democrats can't play the victim card with me. And since I have been talking about the same-sex marriage issue from that personal point of view, they can't use that "rightwing" canard they've been getting away with. Of course, the openness of most Libertarians to immigration helps with another Democrat faction, the Hispanics.


3. If elected as North Carolina's Senator, what would be your three primary legislative priorities?

Chris Cole: Ending the income tax, ending the war in Iraq, and promoting a non-punishment approach to illegal immigration (ending the prohibitions on low-end labor that create an economic demand for a black-market to fill that labor need).


4. Hawking some form of universal health care seems to be big this year for both Republicans and Democrats. What do Libertarians offer American voters who may not have health insurance?

Chris Cole: Ending the income tax will provide an instant pay increase, enabling everyone to better provide for their own healthcare. Also, state mandates make a huge difference in insurance premiums in different states. Similar policies cost triple in New Jersey what they do in Iowa, for example, yet individuals are forbidden to purchase coverage from outside their home states. I would use the interstate commerce authority to require states to permit residents to purchase policies from any state, greatly expanding access to insurance. On the state level, I would expect Libertarian statesmen to remove licensing and other restrictions on alternative healthcare, such as chiropractors, giving expanded access to much cheaper healthcare options.


5. Election to the Senate means dealing with foreign policy. Over the next six years, what is the biggest change that needs to occur in American foreign policy?

Chris Cole: In his book "A Foreign Policy of Freedom", Ron Paul gives repeated examples of how a coercive foreign policy has resulted in unintended consequences that were far worse than the situations we were trying to correct. I think that our future survival as a species, much less as a free society, depends on the adoption of a non-interventionist foreign policy. Not only is it necessary for global peace, but also for liberty here at home. The Founders got it right, such as when James Madison said, "If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. Of all the enemies to public liberty, war is perhaps the most to be dreaded because it comprises and develops the germ of every other. War is the parent of armies; from these proceed debts and taxes; and armies, and debts, and taxes are the known instruments for bringing the many under the domination of the few. The loss of liberty at home is to be charged to the provisions against danger, real or imagined, from abroad."


Thanks, Chris.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...