Skip to main content

You may have noticed the absence of general election-related material...

... which is because--aside from fervently praying for the success of some Libertarian candidates in state and local races, as well as the failure of Prop 8 in California--I have reached the saturation point.

It happened this weekend at my daughter's soccer tournament (where anybody with a pistol seems to have had a concealed carry permit). Moments after I watched her execute to leap of her twelve-year-old life to stop a rocket at the crossbar of the goal, I realized, This is what is important to me..

About two devout Statists (yes, f**king Uber-Statists, jason), contending for the Presidency, I simply no longer give a shit.

I'm done.

I'll deal with policy and politics as it comes, but you know what?

I'm still a free American citizen regardless of what twit is in the White House. I'll cling to my goddamn guns and my goddamn Bible for security, and I'll hang out with former goddamn terrorists if I jolly well feel like it. My wife and I will teach our children the values we think they should have, then we'll send them to school to find out about the real world, and cringe while they make mistakes as teenagers. [The biggest mistake my oldest daughter ever made is the adorable, blond-haired five-year-old grandson I cannot imagine life without. Mistakes happen. So does shit. Life goes on, or it doesn't.]

I'll engage in grey markets, black markets, and cheat on taxes as necessary.

I'll get a thrill running up my leg in 2010 when I lie to the census taker again.

Anybody who believes in that Change We Can Believe In is about to overcome global warming, Chinese alarm clocks, homophobia, or the fact that Amanda Tapping's new SF series Sanctuary really sucks is an idiot.

Conversely, anybody who hasn't realized that Sarah Palin can no more spell Libertarian than First Amendment, or that "Country First" begs the question of, "What's second, by the way, John?" is a moron.

I say again: for at least the next 48 hours I no longer give a shit.

You're welcome to join my party, or go on pretending that this all matters.

It's a free country (sort of) (for now).

Comments

tom said…
"It's a free country (sort of) (for now)."

Yeah, in some ways Delaware is perhaps more free than it should be.

The Department of "Justice" is currently doing their best to let the guy who beat a friend of mine severely, while attempting to rape and kill her, go home free and serve no jail time pay no fine, not even restitution for her medical bills or her property that he damaged during the attack.

In return for his pleading guilty to a (meaningless) felony they are going to give him a plane ticket to London at taxpayer expense.

The prosecutor even attempted to offer him a misdemeanor plea, but Homeland Security told him it had to be a felony or they couldn't deport him.
I'm with you ! There's nothing cooler than a kid's soccer game, especially at that age.
Tyler Nixon said…
AMEN, Steve. You rock brother.

The cult of personality atop the cult of the presidency atop the cult of messianic government atop the cult of beneficent authoritarianism is about the sum reality of the bipolar political discourse to which we have been subjected in frenzied deluge.

One thing I hope from an Obama win is that some of these people will finally just shut the fuck up already and show the rest of us all that hope and change.

There is certain to be a hangover, in large part from the vicious nastiness and nasty viciousness the ultra-partisan lefties co-opted the black soul of some of the worst sort of right-wing scum we have ever seen.

They didn't become the change they sought, they became what they sought to change. I guess people looking for a messiah tend to get stuck in old testament eye-for-an-eye and smite-thy-enemy kind of earth-scorching to make the world ready for Him.

The hangover will linger for awhile, I suspect until the same statist propagandists return to savage those wondering where all that hope and change went.

Leopards don't change their spots and base rank partisans with a penchant for angry berzerkery and now a taste for blood will carry on their poison towards anyone who dares question the coming uber-ObamAmerica.

Nevertheless, being on the receiving end of over-the-top nastiness and bile will surely have served some of us at least, in the moving forward. I liken it to immunizing yourself through repeated small dose exposures to a malignant pathogen.

Bring it, nasty spinmeisters. We saw you come around with Bill and Hill, and then your same ilk with George W. and Karlheinz.

You are the ones who will be facing accountability, for better or worse. You best put away your tap dancing away and get your boots on.
The Last Ephor said…
"I'll engage in grey markets, black markets, and cheat on taxes as necessary."

Ha! Awesome.
Hube said…
Beautifully stated, Steve!

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...