Skip to main content

Obama and Gitmo: Being damned for being responsible

OK, first off: Gitmo is a blight on America's honor and needs to be closed.

That having been said, President-elect Barack Obama is getting way too much shit from people about his statement that closing down Gitmo is complicated and won't be accomplished in 100 days.

What exactly did you expect him to do?

If he were to issue an Executive Order closing Gitmo in his first week, he'd have three choices of what to do with the prisoners:

1) Transport them to Federal holding facilities within the US. There is precedent for keeping people months and even years without charges--President Jimmy Carter did it with the Marielista boatlift prisoners, and Reagan, Bush, Clinton all quietly followed suit, leaving them to rot--primarily at Fort Chaffee Arkansas. But given that most of the folks at Gitmo have known identities and already have attorneys, that's not going to work.

2) Find other countries to take them as prisoners. Aside from the moral implications (rendition to countries with torture and no-due-process death penalties), there's the problem. Dubya has not been negotiating this, so Obama's State Department would have to start from scratch.

3) Release them. Aside from the dangers inherent with about 10-15% of these folks, where do you plan on releasing them? A lot were taken on battlefields in Iraq or Afghanistan, so releasing them there would require the agreement of those governments. Afghanistan actually has taken a large number of Gitmo prisoners back, but only on a case by case basis.

Point being: having said I will close Gitmo, the new President should enjoy a reasonable amount of time to make good his promise in a responsible manner. It is an inherently different proposition, I would suggest, than developing a strategy for dealing with Iran or Gaza, both of which are much higher priority national security concerns and won't go away.

Here's what Obama could do right now to silence his critics: issue an early Executive Order ending all enhanced interrogation techniques at Gitmo, extend Geneva Convention protections to the detainees there (there is a way to do this for captives who do not have a protecting power, and immediately open up the facility to international inspection.

And--to be perfectly honest--I expect his administration to take those steps pretty early. This is a campaign promise that I believe Barack Obama will keep.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Exile them to Gilligan's Island and let the Skipper handle them.
Anonymous said…
I've been to Fort Chaffee, and I'd have to say sending them there would constitute cruel and unusual punishment.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...