Skip to main content

Socialist Scumbag Says Obama Stinks Like Bush

Huggy Chavez, socialist dictator and bully a**hole extraordinaire apparently thinks Obama's stench is no better than Bush's.

Chavez is a master manipulator, deep in bed with the tyrant Castro regime. His condemnation of Obama, before we have even see how closely Obama's foreign policy may/will resemble Bush's, is evidence of Chavez's general hatred of the United States, irrespective of who our Chief Executive may be.

Let's hope that Obama, maybe somewhere down the road, realizes that America's insane drug prohibition policies, and the massive black narco-trafficking to which they have given rise, are just as, if not more, responsible for the success of organizations like FARC as the Chavez's of the world.

The forces of narco-trafficking and leftist revolutionaries go hand-in-hand, both intent on destabilizing social order and debilitating even just basic governance, in order to achieve their ends.

Irrespective of Chavez's tyranny and regional meddling, he is but a minor factor in the big picture puzzle of narco-terrorism and "revolutionary" chaos in countries like Colombia.

Obama is right about Chavez as a terrorist-funder, but Obama would be wise to consider real changes in U.S. policy that would put Chavez and those like him in perspective...or better yet, make such tin-horn dictators and narco-traffickers irrelevant.

Frankly, our own interventionist policies, whether drug war driven or otherwise, are as a general statement no more morally-justifiable than Chavez's, given the results.


Chavez Likens Obama's 'Stench' to Bush's

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez apparently doesn't appreciate Barack Obama's classifying him as a supporter of the Colombian terror group, FARC, likening the president-elect's odor to that of Chavez's nemesis, President Bush.

In an interview airing on Venezuelan television and reported by The Washington Post Monday, Chavez said Obama has "the same stench" as Bush. The comment harkens back to September 2006, when Chavez addressed the United Nations General Assembly after Bush and said he could still smell the "sulfur" the U.S. president left behind at the podium.

In an interview that aired on Univision last week, Obama said his administration would try to improve relations with Chavez, but Venezuela has to stop aiding FARC, the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, which is recognized as a terror group by the United States and loathed by Colombians who have been victims of assassinations and kidnappings for the past 45 years. Internal FARC documents captured by Colombian soldiers last year purportedly demonstrated the link between Chavez and the terror organization.

The Post reported that Obama told Univision: "We need to be firm when we see this news, that Venezuela is exporting terrorist activities or supporting malicious entities like the FARC."

Chavez, who is trying to consolidate power by getting voters to agree to abolish term limits, a ploy rejected in a previous effort, was quoted saying that if Obama thinks that Chavez is an obstacle to progress then he must be following orders from certain corners of "the empire."

"If he doesn't obey the orders of the empire, they'll kill him," Chavez said, without naming who "they" are.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Chavez is a petty-ante dictator with a seriously oversized delusion of grandeur.
Delaware Watch said…
Actually, Tyler, Chavez's attitude of Obama doesn't really differ all that much from yours. I've yet to see you write one kind word about Obama...just a lot of frothing and, as always w/ you, red-baiting.
Tyler Nixon said…
Gosh, Dana, are you so conflicted about whether to defend Obama or Chavez, you just decided to attack me instead?

Nice try, though. Since when am I obligated to extend Obama gratuities? I certainly gave Bush none.

I think I'll avoid your solipsistic urgings that I should suspend my reservations to slobber over Obama along with the rest of you.

No thanks.
Delaware Watch said…
"solipsistic urgings"

Solipsism has nothing to do w/ what I said. You should really look up words you don't understand before you use them. It embarrasses you. Friendly advice.
Hube said…
Dana: Just a [friendly] aside here -- how many Venezuelans do you know outside of Magda Korn? I've gotten to know quite a few (via the music group Los Amigos Invisibles) and chatted intensively with them about politics and culture in VZ. These aren't rich, well-to-do people; on the contrary, Los Amigos are probably what you'd call borderline "struggling" musicians as are their friends.

They despise Chávez with a passion. They understand that Hugo is popular with the poor and has a desire to help them. But he's doing so by alienating everyone else. IOW, he'll end up turning VZ into another Cuba -- an economic basket-case with a megalomaniac holding onto perpetual power.
Brian Miller said…
Chavez's attitude of Obama doesn't really differ all that much from yours

Ahhhh, more sense and sensibility from the Obamania quarter.

Tyler, your rhetoric about Obama is like Hitler's rhetoric about the Jews! Shame!
Tyler Nixon said…
Once again Dana ducks all substance to pick a nit.

"sol⋅ip⋅sism - extreme preoccupation with and indulgence of one's feelings, desires, etc.; egoistic self-absorption"

Sorry, Dana, but your implication that I somehow owe Obama a free blow job somewhere along the way, to indulge your desire that we all join in blowing Obama like you, is solipsism defined.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...

The disturbing decline of the Delaware blogosphere: a very unfortunate Around the Horn (even if it's not Friday)

I've noticed a change in my own blog-checking habits over the past several weeks, and I don't know if it's just me or the reality of the last month of a divisive political campaign. I automatically used to check out Delawareliberal first and several times a day, because it was where I could find edgy, thought-provoking, and (dare I say it) funny banter going on. These days visit several other spots first, and my visits to DL are both shorter and less engaged. Why? Because the combination of invading neo-con commenters with the stridency of some of the major contributors has led to such pleasant exchanges as a post dedicated to labeling another blogger racist by donviti, whose own sense of provocative humor is generally so far out there that he makes John Belushi doing Samurai bartender on the SNL look positively pro-Asian. Or I can find Delawaredem and jason periodically spewing the idea that anybody who is not a liberal or progressive Democrat is somehow a non-American,...