Skip to main content

Socialist Scumbag Says Obama Stinks Like Bush

Huggy Chavez, socialist dictator and bully a**hole extraordinaire apparently thinks Obama's stench is no better than Bush's.

Chavez is a master manipulator, deep in bed with the tyrant Castro regime. His condemnation of Obama, before we have even see how closely Obama's foreign policy may/will resemble Bush's, is evidence of Chavez's general hatred of the United States, irrespective of who our Chief Executive may be.

Let's hope that Obama, maybe somewhere down the road, realizes that America's insane drug prohibition policies, and the massive black narco-trafficking to which they have given rise, are just as, if not more, responsible for the success of organizations like FARC as the Chavez's of the world.

The forces of narco-trafficking and leftist revolutionaries go hand-in-hand, both intent on destabilizing social order and debilitating even just basic governance, in order to achieve their ends.

Irrespective of Chavez's tyranny and regional meddling, he is but a minor factor in the big picture puzzle of narco-terrorism and "revolutionary" chaos in countries like Colombia.

Obama is right about Chavez as a terrorist-funder, but Obama would be wise to consider real changes in U.S. policy that would put Chavez and those like him in perspective...or better yet, make such tin-horn dictators and narco-traffickers irrelevant.

Frankly, our own interventionist policies, whether drug war driven or otherwise, are as a general statement no more morally-justifiable than Chavez's, given the results.


Chavez Likens Obama's 'Stench' to Bush's

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez apparently doesn't appreciate Barack Obama's classifying him as a supporter of the Colombian terror group, FARC, likening the president-elect's odor to that of Chavez's nemesis, President Bush.

In an interview airing on Venezuelan television and reported by The Washington Post Monday, Chavez said Obama has "the same stench" as Bush. The comment harkens back to September 2006, when Chavez addressed the United Nations General Assembly after Bush and said he could still smell the "sulfur" the U.S. president left behind at the podium.

In an interview that aired on Univision last week, Obama said his administration would try to improve relations with Chavez, but Venezuela has to stop aiding FARC, the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, which is recognized as a terror group by the United States and loathed by Colombians who have been victims of assassinations and kidnappings for the past 45 years. Internal FARC documents captured by Colombian soldiers last year purportedly demonstrated the link between Chavez and the terror organization.

The Post reported that Obama told Univision: "We need to be firm when we see this news, that Venezuela is exporting terrorist activities or supporting malicious entities like the FARC."

Chavez, who is trying to consolidate power by getting voters to agree to abolish term limits, a ploy rejected in a previous effort, was quoted saying that if Obama thinks that Chavez is an obstacle to progress then he must be following orders from certain corners of "the empire."

"If he doesn't obey the orders of the empire, they'll kill him," Chavez said, without naming who "they" are.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Chavez is a petty-ante dictator with a seriously oversized delusion of grandeur.
Delaware Watch said…
Actually, Tyler, Chavez's attitude of Obama doesn't really differ all that much from yours. I've yet to see you write one kind word about Obama...just a lot of frothing and, as always w/ you, red-baiting.
Tyler Nixon said…
Gosh, Dana, are you so conflicted about whether to defend Obama or Chavez, you just decided to attack me instead?

Nice try, though. Since when am I obligated to extend Obama gratuities? I certainly gave Bush none.

I think I'll avoid your solipsistic urgings that I should suspend my reservations to slobber over Obama along with the rest of you.

No thanks.
Delaware Watch said…
"solipsistic urgings"

Solipsism has nothing to do w/ what I said. You should really look up words you don't understand before you use them. It embarrasses you. Friendly advice.
Hube said…
Dana: Just a [friendly] aside here -- how many Venezuelans do you know outside of Magda Korn? I've gotten to know quite a few (via the music group Los Amigos Invisibles) and chatted intensively with them about politics and culture in VZ. These aren't rich, well-to-do people; on the contrary, Los Amigos are probably what you'd call borderline "struggling" musicians as are their friends.

They despise Chávez with a passion. They understand that Hugo is popular with the poor and has a desire to help them. But he's doing so by alienating everyone else. IOW, he'll end up turning VZ into another Cuba -- an economic basket-case with a megalomaniac holding onto perpetual power.
Brian Miller said…
Chavez's attitude of Obama doesn't really differ all that much from yours

Ahhhh, more sense and sensibility from the Obamania quarter.

Tyler, your rhetoric about Obama is like Hitler's rhetoric about the Jews! Shame!
Tyler Nixon said…
Once again Dana ducks all substance to pick a nit.

"sol⋅ip⋅sism - extreme preoccupation with and indulgence of one's feelings, desires, etc.; egoistic self-absorption"

Sorry, Dana, but your implication that I somehow owe Obama a free blow job somewhere along the way, to indulge your desire that we all join in blowing Obama like you, is solipsism defined.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...